Can anything be deduced from those images?

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
Post Reply
User avatar
ndwannabe
Family Elder
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Can anything be deduced from those images?

Post by ndwannabe »

The more I look at my Doppler, the more suspicious it seems.

I know "they" looked and said it was normal, I still have some questions.

How come my Left Proximal Jugular looks of equal width along whatever distance the image was taken, but the other two images show distinct narrowing. I mean, if the widest part of my Left Distal Jugular image is 5.7mm, what does it make the "skinny" part? About 3mm?

All the while my Right Proximal Jugular is a whooping 22.5mm in the widest part, though looks much skinnier on the other side?

Or is this just the way they do imaging and I am not interpreting it right?

Equal:
Image

Skinny part ~ 3mm?
Image

The fat right one
Image
User avatar
Johnson
Family Elder
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Ucluluet, BC
Contact:

Post by Johnson »

Hopefully, Doc. Sclafani will comment on it. He knows valves way better than I do. Laugh

All I can really deduce is that those areas are significant to whomever captured the pictures.
My name is not really Johnson. MSed up since 1993
User avatar
Billmeik
Family Elder
Posts: 696
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:00 pm

Post by Billmeik »

early false creek?
User avatar
sou
Family Elder
Posts: 582
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by sou »

How about the flows?
User avatar
bestadmom
Family Elder
Posts: 722
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: CT
Contact:

Post by bestadmom »

You should post this on Dr. Sclafani's thread. That's the best way to be sure he sees it.
Post Reply

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”