FlashHack is Liberated

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

Postby nicknewf » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:23 pm

So how was your neuro appointment? Can't wait to read the story.

My wife had her treatment today, and is doing well. Sore azygous, sore neck. All three ballooned, no stents, no miracles, mild symptoms anyway. See how it goes in a few weeks.
User avatar
nicknewf
Family Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: St. John's, NL

Advertisement

Postby cheerleader » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:14 pm

FlashHack wrote:But, my main problem was in the azygos and that chart was directly to the right. Holy cow! Of the 56 patients where Zamboni found problems in the azygos only one restenosed at 6 months (one other had to be stented right out of the gate, the only stent Zamboni used)!! That means 96% of the treated azygos veins stayed open. So if your problems are limited to the azygos, as mine were, you don't have to worry much about restenosis. Whew!

I'm sure that most of you already saw that, but I hadn't and so I thought I would mention it in case someone shared my ignorance.


Yup. You mainly azygos folks have won the lottery :)
I remember thinking, when I heard Zamboni present the 96% figure in Bologna...well, your MS course is tougher with azygos involvement, but the repair is easier! And it holds.
breath easy and keep healing, Flash--
cheer
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com
User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
 
Posts: 5015
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: southern California

Postby FlashHack » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:25 pm

Thanks, Cheer!

Well, I saw the head of Neurology at OHSU today. I related to him all of my improvements and he recorded them in my chart. I described my procedure and where the doctor had found stenosis. I asked him if he had altered his position on Zamboni's theories. He said he had not and then asked me if I had heard of the two studies that used Zamboni's scanning protocols but couldn't reproduce his results. Disappointing, but not surprising.

He was glad to hear that I was participating in one of the gait studies they are doing. He also told me that he wouldn't charge me for my next appointment if I still didn't have insurance. He also asked if I wanted to get back on Rebif (I stopped in June). No thanks, doc!

I will see him again next May. While I hope that he changes his thinking by then, will it really matter? Will the Interventional Radiologists at OHSU continue to cow-tow to Neurology while their colleagues at other hospitals are doing procedures and validating Zamboni's findings?

One upside was that before I saw the doctor I did my thing with the gait study. On each 6 month visit they have you fill out a survey about your MS. The last question asked you to describe your disability progression by selecting one of several charts. Each chart had time moving from left to right on the X axis and disability on the Y axis. Of course on each chart disability increased over time in different patterns. I cheerfully told the researcher that I couldn't choose any of the charts because my disability line was now going the other direction.
User avatar
FlashHack
Family Elder
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby FlashHack » Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:14 am

I'm way overdue in posting an update on my condition.

I walked into my July 2010 CCSVI treatment using a cane for balance and left not needing one. My symptoms continued to improve for about 12 months. Then half of them started getting worse, mostly dealing with my lower extremities (numbness, stiffness, tingling, and fatigue). My balance, headache, urinary, and visual disturbances kept improving. Eighteen months post procedure I was back to using a cane anytime I left the house. The distance I could walk slowly shrunk until, by the end of 2013, 100 yards was as far as I could manage without sitting and resting. I purchased a manual wheelchair in November 2013.

In August 2013 I was introduced to a local physician with MS who had undergone a treatment called Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) performed by a Dr. Richard Burt in Chicago at Northwestern Memorial. It involves harvesting your stem cells, killing your immune system with chemotherapy, and then rebooting your immune system with the harvested stem cells. A radical treatment indeed, but this physician was 2 years post tx and had seen tremendous improvements in his symptoms. I wasn't sure how I felt about the whole thing since HSCT fully embraces the "autoimmune theory" of MS and I had wanted so badly for CCSVI to be the solution to this terrible disease.

Despite my reservations, my accelerating deterioration made me cast them aside any reservations and embrace the opportunity to receive HSCT for my MS. Over the course of January 2014 through March 2014 I had my stem cells harvested and underwent chemo therapy to destroy my immune system. On February 24th I received an infusion of my own stem cells to reboot my immune system. I spent the next two weeks in isolation as my hair fell out and my immune system rebooted.

Within 2 days of having my immune system destroyed by the chemo drugs, I started getting feeling back in my toes. I had not felt them for a good 12 months. Because I could feel the bottoms of my feet again, my balance has improved dramatically. It has now been three months post treatment and my legs continue to strengthen gradually. I can now feel muscles in my legs, buttocks and lower back that were all but gone. My wheelchair is beginning to gather dust.

My mind is trying to reconcile my own experience and what I know of MS and CCSVI. Venoplasty of my stenosed azygos vein helped me but did not cure me. Is this because by the time it was fixed my immune system had already become programmed to attack my myelin? I'm now pretty convinced that this is the case. MS is a vascular condition that converts to an autoimmune disease. Once this conversion happens, fixing the veins can only do so much. The vascular part explains some of the symptoms and also provides the missing genesis for the well documented autoimmune condition. It lines up with the animal models for MS which, as I understand, involve injecting ground up myelin combined with an "agimen"(sp?) into the CSF. This agimen is basically a foreign agent or pathogen that triggers the autoimmune response. I am guessing that is why so many MS studies find links to things like Epstein Bar and other blood born viruses/toxins that essentially serve as the agimen. It would also explain why some people can have stenosed veins but never develop full blown MS.

Anyway, I wanted to throw this information out there in case it inspires others.

Incidentally, the HSCT treatment cost almost $200,000. Remarkably, my Blue Cross insurance picked up the tab without complaint.
User avatar
FlashHack
Family Elder
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby NHE » Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:45 pm

Thanks for the update. Do you know the current status of your veins? Are they still patent?
User avatar
NHE
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby FlashHack » Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:30 pm

I'm actually pretty sure that they are. I had several symptoms that resolved after ccsvi surgery and have not returned. My only stenosis was in my azygos which has a high patency rate.
User avatar
FlashHack
Family Elder
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby Cece » Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:50 am

FlashHack wrote:Incidentally, the HSCT treatment cost almost $200,000. Remarkably, my Blue Cross insurance picked up the tab without complaint.

8O That's amazing.
Great to hear that you're on the upswing.
A one-two punch to MS might be what you've done: take care of the veins, wait to see if the aberrant immune system settles, and if it doesn't, then hit it with something like HSCT.
The reason the azygous vein responded so well to treatment in Zamboni's research might be that it is a smaller vein, and Zamboni was using smaller balloons, and so the fit happened to be better. This compares to the jugular veins, where Zamboni was using a 10 mm balloon despite the jugular veins being in some cases significantly larger.
If you haven't had a venogram since 2010, then I am going to go with missed jugular stenosis as a possibility that has not been eliminated.
I do agree that if abnormal immune function has been triggered by CCSVI, then treating the CCSVI does not undo that in everyone. In the future, this could be prevented by treating CCSVI before MS even gets a chance to start. To the future.
Cece
Family Elder
 
Posts: 8991
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby FlashHack » Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:11 am

Dr. Siskin was quite thorough. My jugs were fine, but he ballooned them anyway. Also went all the way up near my eyes. I'm quite confident that I didn't have jugular stenosis.
User avatar
FlashHack
Family Elder
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby dlynn » Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:30 pm

FlashHack,
Here is a very interesting article on chemo.
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2014/03/c ... rophy.html
User avatar
dlynn
Family Elder
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby RCC » Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:11 pm

Hi FlashHack,

I wish you well on your recovery! Try to avoid people that have negative things to say about your course of action, it does not help.
User avatar
RCC
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: FlashHack is Liberated

Postby dlynn » Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:22 pm

RCC,
If you are referring to the chemo article, what interested me was towards the end, is very helpful information
regarding healing the body and staying healthy after chemo. If not, please accept my apology. And FlashHack,
I wish you all the best.
User avatar
dlynn
Family Elder
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:00 pm

Previous

Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users