I voted, for what's it's worth. I'm the sole "dramatic improvement", which of course is a death knell in the credibility department, but oh well. If I said I was 85.9% better, people would *know* I'm speaking the truth. Perhaps these can be structured in percentages instead of dramatic vs. moderate, that way I can vote, and get the cred bump at the same time.
Otherwise it's dismissed as being too positive.
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko
, Virtually symptom free since, no relap