This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:46 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Houston, TX
Going through the tracking project cases, I'm noticing that ppl who have jugular vein issues have problems with the internal, not the external jugular veins.

Here, Cheerleader points out the important role of the externals:

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-7519.html

So my question is whether or not the externals are being checked and treated as well?

_________________
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. - Al Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:14 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4695
Location: southern California
AC-
That's a great thread, glad it's been reposted. It's actually about the internal jugular veins (IJVs) being resectioned...not the external jugular veins. The "external" reference in the paper refers to outside of the brain. The external jugulars are much smaller and drain the exterior of the brain and face, not as essential to the brain, and not related to where we see lesions in MS.


Quote:
Authors of previous studies have suggested that the vertebral venous system should be adept at tolerating increased venous drainage when internal jugular venous flow is compromised, thereby raising the question as to if there were physiological consequences associated with bi-lateral IJV resection including facial cyanosis and edema.5


Many docs think the collateral circulation formed if the IJVs are not working should be sufficient for drainage. This paper says otherwise.
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any abnormalities seen with extrernal jugs?

mooshell

3

1305

Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:10 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. EECP enhanced external counterpulsation

Cece

5

326

Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Cece View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers

Advertise on the premier multiple sclerosis forum