This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 2:45 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:39 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 91
Location: Northampton UK
concerned wrote:
Floatation devices can be clearly demonstrated to save lives. With 'Liberation' would be a little more difficult to show life saving potentital, and I don't mean like "oh, billy, your a life saver!!!"


Can you honestly say that all these drugs are life saving... take tysrbi for instance, is it life saving, in fact ALL MS drugs are just there tohelp with symptoms not LIFE SAVING yet they all get thrown on the market and in some cases fast tracked.... So why does the liberation treatment have to be LIFE SAVING, if it helps with the symptoms and raises a persons quality of life, to them that is LIFE SAVING enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:51 pm 
a) I never said those drugs are life saving.
b) I never said 'liberation' had to be life saving to be useful.
c) someone else brought up life saving in relation to compassionate use of 'liberation' and I was responding to them.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:01 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Got to love...
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:41 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 82
gotta love this dialogue. I am one who is just this side of EDSS 10 (the scale doesn't go higher than 10 so I guess that means......) and I would like the opportunity to choose or refuse service. I'm trying to find some one to try a "Liberation" on me. I will hope and I can try. Right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Got to love...
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:21 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 849
Location: Canada
ppicklee wrote:
gotta love this dialogue. I am one who is just this side of EDSS 10 (the scale doesn't go higher than 10 so I guess that means......) and I would like the opportunity to choose or refuse service. I'm trying to find some one to try a "Liberation" on me. I will hope and I can try. Right?


ppicklee .. love your name :)..
you are RIGHT!
I pray that someone wayyyy wayyyy more important than me is reading your post and I will fight and pray for your right to choose.
Thank you,
pCakes


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Got to love...
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:07 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 314
Location: grande prairie , alberta,canada
ppicklee wrote:
gotta love this dialogue. I am one who is just this side of EDSS 10 (the scale doesn't go higher than 10 so I guess that means......) and I would like the opportunity to choose or refuse service. I'm trying to find some one to try a "Liberation" on me. I will hope and I can try. Right?


ppicklee, it's people like you that need this to be attempted YESTERDAY !
I am EDSS 7.0 and was only diagnosed in May 2008. I'm galloping to my 10 but I don't dwell on it. I am certainly not in a position to wait until it's available here in Canada. I owe it to my family , friends and myself to try this asap.
At least I can afford to have the testing and treatment but thousands of Canadians can't.
I will also fight for your opportunity to get the procedure - if indicated.
Good luck.
The dude who wrote that opinion in this post is in a position of Chair of a Canadian Research group and no doubt shares all the same biases as those on the CIHR and MS society brass. gl ppicklee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:25 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 172
Location: Putnam, NY
frodo,
you tickle my funny bone! :lol: and boy, I needed that tonight.
elyse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 172
Location: Putnam, NY
ppicklee,
i'm praying for a light to go on in the currently unlit mind of the right person of power in time for help for you. i'm also praying for your strength to get through the days and nights until then.
garyak, prayers for your struggle too.
elyse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:31 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 481
Location: Brussels, Capital of Europe
The article raises three questions.
on the availability of budget: non-sense argument. you have to judge the case on its merits, there is enough money for good cases
on the ethics ie the absense of scientific proof of the biological link between CCSVI and MS: is non-sense; you can not plausibly deny.
support from provincial governments legitimize this currently questionable technique in the eyes of desperate patients, thus helping to buttress a market for the less reputable clinics throughout the world that are offering the treatment, often at a hefty price? you can look at this the other way around too: how responsible is the position of authorities, knowing that angioplasty is very often not a one-fix thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:15 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 462
concerned wrote:
thornyrose76 wrote:
concerned wrote:
PCakes wrote:
concerned wrote:
I think angioplasty [for MS] is being denied as a life saving measure because it hasn't been demonstrated to save lives.

8O


Where has it been shown to have lifesaving potential beyond anecdotal reports?


There have been numerous videos posted online givingproof of it's benefit, do a little bit of research, watch it . Yeah there are some that show not much if any improvement, while others it is obvious, and it is hardly placebo effect. You are hardly concerned about any MS sufferer if you are so quick to pan the theory. :?


What about videos of people showing improvements after faith healing? Should the government pay for that too?

Also, I am concerned about my mother, which is why I'm feeding her right now.



Faith healing..hhm, right. How are you able to feed your mother and type at the same time?

Who has time for this? Geez, good luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:15 am 
My mother has to take breaks from eating and recline in her wheelchair.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Feature Article in The Globe and Mail

cheerleader

12

1956

Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:25 am

Loobie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Globe and Mail Article: Epilipsy Surgery

Hope66

0

739

Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:18 pm

Hope66 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Patients stories in the Globe and Mail

dania

1

854

Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:33 pm

Blaze View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Globe Article

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Blaze

17

2043

Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:22 pm

debp View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. NMSS mass e-mail has article about CCSVI

Vonna

1

953

Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:22 am

jay123 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: