Published article from Tiawan on CCSVI

[NZer1]

Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2011 Mar;20(1):1-3.
Jugular venous reflux and neurological disorders.
Hsu HY.
Source
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Abstract
Usually, disturbance of arterial blood supply and circulation of cerebrospinal fluid are considered more clinically relevant, though accumulating data suggest that cerebral venous insufficiency does have important pathophysiological consequences in various neurological diseases(1-5). Hindrance of principal and collateral cerebral venous outflow will cause elevation of venous pressure, insufficiency of cerebral blood flow (CBF), increase of intracranial pressure, and eventually lead to parenchymal abnormalities. Disorders involving cerebral venous circulation, such as cerebral sinus thrombosis, dural arteriovenous fistula, and surgical sacrifice of the cerebral veins, may lead to serious complications. However, most physicians do not assign practical importance to cerebral venous circulation. Internal jugular vein (IJV) is a main extracranial route for cerebral venous drainage. The jugular venous valves, which are located near the junction with the innominant vein, prevent the transmission of thoracic pressure and the reflux of venous blood into the cerebral circulation. Jugular valve insufficiency could result in retrograde jugular venous flow and back transmission of central venous pressure. Previous studies have found significant associations between jugular venous reflux (JVR) and neurological disorders including transient global amnesia(1), transient monocular blindness(2), multiple sclerosis(3), exertional headache(4), and idiopathic intracranial hypertension(6). Investigators from Taiwan contributed a lot to current understanding in the cerebral venous circulation(1,2,7-9). However, there are some conceptual and technical limitations that challenge the relationship between JVR and clinical symptoms. Moreover, the association between JVR and neurological diseases can not be translate directly into a causal relationship. In this issue, Chung et al. demonstrate that JVR influences cerebral blood flow while performing a Valsalva manerver in their study(10). This study gives direct evidence that supports the effect of JVR on CBF. This finding provides supplementary information to their previous works concerning the relationship between JVR and neurological disorders, and also raises some questions. The main venous drainage routes vary with aging and are different among individuals(11,12). The extent and distribution of reduced cerebral perfusion resulting from right and left JVR could be different. The right JVR had a greater influence on CBF compared with left JVR in current study(10). In contrast, JVR occurred more frequently on left side in their previous study(1). The inconsistent findings may result from variations in the anatomic configuration of cerebral venous system, study population, and the capacity of collateral circles for drainage. Besides, the IJV may collapse and blood is shunted to an alternative venous pathway in standing position in which most neurological symptoms occurs(13). The influence of JVR on CBF in standing position has not been well evaluated. Some authors suggested a postural element was involved in the pathophysiology of cerebral venous insufficiency(14). Factors that determining the greater influence of JVR on CBF need further studies. Methods for diagnosing JVR vary in different studies. There is no consensus in quantification and diagnosis of cerebral venous insufficiency currently. Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is able to demonstrate the extent of intracranial venous reflux and related parenchymal lesion(s). However, recent study showed that MRV had limited value for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis(15). Noninvasive sonography has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting cerebral venous insufficiency(3,15,16). In addition, sonography has the advantage in evaluation of dynamic flow changes during various physiological challenges, notably Valsalva maneuver. Sonography is a good tool for the detection of cerebral venous insufficiency and JVR in experienced hands. The use of ultrasound contrast and respiratory maneuvers could be helpful in diagnosing cerebral venous insufficiency, but not essential. Selective venography helps to determine the location of venous stenosis/ occlusion and to measure the venous pressure directly. Furthermore, endovascular treatment has been reported effective in relieving intracranial hypertension and improving neurological function in some multiple sclerosis patients(17). Still, extrapolating the benefit of intravenous interventions should be cautious because there is no randomized trial yet(18,19). Current understanding of cerebral venous disorders is imperfect. Clinical evaluation of cerebral venous circulation is somewhat difficulty because variation in the anatomic configuration of cerebral venous system is a rule. Although the pathogenetic role of JVR needs more evidence to prove, cerebral venous insufficiency could be a neglected and treatable cause of some neurological disorders. Further studies may be needed to provide more insight into JVR and its potential relationship with neurological disorders.

[ikulo]

Here is the article the above-mentioned paper refers to:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21249580

Jugular venous reflux could influence cerebral blood flow: a transcranial Doppler study.
Wu IH, Sheng WY, Hu HH, Chung CP.
Source
Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Abstract

MPurpose: Studies have found significant associations between jugular venous reflux (JVR) and neurological disorders. However, there still lacks evidences that JVR could influence cerebral circulation. The aim of the present study is trying to provide evidences that the retrogradely-transmitted venous pressure of JVR could reach cerebral venous system and has an influence on cerebral blood flow (CBF).

Methods: We recruited 50 volunteers. Only 42 subjects' data (55.81 􀅲 19.96, 23 - 85 years; 9 women) were analyzed due to poor temporal windows in eight subjects. JVR was determined by color-coded Duplex sonography. Transcranial Doppler study was used to examine the CBF changes during Valsalva maneuver (VM) in each subject.

Results: All JVRs were detected during VM. We divided subjects into people with right JVR (n=12), left JVR (n=13) and no JVR (n=21) and four had bilateral JVR. There was a more decrease in CBF during and immediately after VM in right-JVR group than no-JVR group, though the baseline characteristics and arterial blood pressure changes were similar. There were no demographic and hemodynamic differences between left-JVR group and no-JVR group.

Conclusion: We are the first to provide evidences that right JVR during VM could influence CBF. However, whether left JVR with or without right JVR may have similar effect on CBF deserves further study. The definite mechanism underlying this finding needs further studies.