This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 4:22 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:54 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
http://registration.akm.ch/einsicht.php ... KEN_ID=900

As Dr. Zamboni has been saying for a few years....intraluminal malformations (like the truncular venous malformations found in Budd-Chiari) are inside the jugular veins of pwMS. And these have hemodynamic consequences.

Quote:
Friday, October 21, 2011, 17:30 - 17:45
Anatomical and histological analysis of venous structures associated with chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency

C. Diaconu, S. Staugaitis, J. McBride, C. Schwanger, A. Rae-Grant, R. Fox (Cleveland, US)
Background: Chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is a new theory for MS pathogenesis. CCSVI includes alterations in cerebral venous outflow and is often assessed by ultrasound or magnetic resonance venography (MRV). No gross anatomical description of venous outflow in MS has been reported to date.
Methods: We harvested bilateral internal jugular (IJV), subclavian, brachiocephalic, and azygous (AZY) veins from 7 deceased MS patients and 6 non-MS controls. Veins were injected with silicone, dissected en bloc, incised longitudinally to expose the luminal surface, and fixed. All valves and structural abnormalities were characterized and photographed using a stereomicroscope. Vein wall stenosis was defined as a >= 50% reduction in cross-sectional area, defined from vein wall circumference and compared to a normal appearing region in the same vein.
Results: A variety of vein abnormalities were identified. The incidence of vein wall stenoses was similar in MS and controls: eight stenoses in 4 of 7 MS patients and five in 3 of 6 controls. Marked valvular and other intraluminal abnormalities with potential hemodynamic consequences were identified in 5 of 7 MS patients (7 abnormalities) and in 1 of 6 controls (1 abnormality). These abnormalities included circumferential membranous structures (1 MS and 1 control), longitudinally-oriented membranous structures (3 MS), single valve flap replacing IJV valve (2 MS), and enlarged and malpositioned valve leaflets (1 MS). In addition, minor anatomic variations without expected hemodynamic consequences were observed similarly in both MS and controls. These included valves with >2 leaflets, the presence of valves in the AZY, additional (duplicate) normal-appearing IJV valves, and small membranous septa.
Conclusion: Post mortem examination of the IJV and AZY veins of MS patients and non-MS controls demonstrated a variety of structural abnormalities and anatomic variations. Vein wall stenosis occurred at similar frequency in MS and non-MS controls. However, the frequency of intraluminal abnormalities with possible hemodynamic consequences was higher in MS patients compared to healthy controls, although the current sample size is limited. These results suggest that MRV (which predominantly evaluates vein wall stenoses) may be less effective than ultrasound in identifying venous abnormalities in CCSVI. In addition, examining only wall circumference in CCSVI ultrasound studies may miss some intraluminal abnormalities.
Claudiu Diaconu has nothing to disclose. Susan Staugaitis, MD,PhD, has nothing to disclose. Jennifer McBride, PhD, has nothing to disclose. Cynthia Schwanger has nothing to disclose. Alexander Rae-Grant, MD, presented a lecture for Teva Neuroscience and Biogen Idec with personal compensation. Robert Fox, MD, has received personal consulting or speaking fees from Biogen Idec, Genentech, Novartis, and Teva Neuroscience, and has served on clinical trial advisory committees for Biogen Idec. The current project is supported by the National MS Society (RC 1004-A-5).

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:05 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 521
Thanks once more, cheer. Now let's wait for somebody saying that CCSVI does not exist.

_________________
You can get a worldwide list of available sites for CCSVI at http://www.ccsviclinic.info


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:24 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Quote:
Marked valvular and other intraluminal abnormalities with potential hemodynamic consequences were identified in 5 of 7 MS patients (7 abnormalities) and in 1 of 6 controls (1 abnormality). These abnormalities included circumferential membranous structures (1 MS and 1 control), longitudinally-oriented membranous structures (3 MS), single valve flap replacing IJV valve (2 MS), and enlarged and malpositioned valve leaflets (1 MS). In addition, minor anatomic variations without expected hemodynamic consequences were observed similarly in both MS and controls. These included valves with >2 leaflets, the presence of valves in the AZY, additional (duplicate) normal-appearing IJV valves, and small membranous septa.

This is excellent. Since we are looking at visible structural abnormalities, it is hard to argue with autopsy results.

They found more of the longitudinally-oriented membranous structures (aka septums) than what we usually hear about here. Perhaps these are underdiagnosed in patients? Could they be missed on IVUS?

A single valve flap replacing IJV valve might be how you'd describe my left jugular issue, unless it were better described as an enlarged valve leaflet. Finding only three valve abnormalities total in seven MS patients (14 jugulars) is fewer than what the IRs are seeing in living patients.

But this is clear support of the association between CCSVI intraluminal abnormalities and MS. It also helps clarify why there might be so much difficulty finding CCSVI, if the imaging studies are failing to differentiate between venous wall stenoses, which were found equally in both the MS patients and controls, and the intraluminal abnormalities, which were overwhelmingly found in the MS patients.

frodo, we have never had an autopsy study saying that CCSVI does not exist in MS patients, and I do not think we will see one. This is flesh, it is either there or not there, and it is there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Absolutely right, Cece. The advantage of having IVUS to see the real hemodynamic flow in vivo is all that is missing....but these malformations exist. Very excited that Dr. Fox, and MS neurologist from the Cleveland Clinic, actually participated in this study and saw what Dr. Zamboni has been writing about all these years. Finally....
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Here is Dr. Fox from ECTRIMS, doing a video interview for the MS Society, discussing his study....
this is big news, folks. A major neurologist from Cleveland Clinic finding venous malformations in autopsied jugular veins in pwMS, discussing the importance of correctly done ultrasound testing in CCSVI research. He has consulted with Dr. Zamboni and BNAC.

This may be the beginning of the tide turning....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSijkNDCotA


cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
I'm about to watch it. And I am sure that dehydration did not cause the luminal abnormalities found in this study!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:51 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 411
Location: LeftCoast Canada
Hmmmm. One group sees 100%, the other 0%. In papers by Simka et.al. involving 000s of people we see a number north of 90%. And neurologists still think their opinion matters . . . . well I guess maybe to the MS Society.

_________________
Albany 2010. Brooklyn 2011
Hurry up and wait.


Last edited by PointsNorth on Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:04 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Cece wrote:
I'm about to watch it. And I am sure that dehydration did not cause the luminal abnormalities found in this study!


very, very true, Cece :)
Dr. Fox is looking into hypovolemia and hydration---but that wouldn't cause a web, septum or inverted valve!
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:45 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2562
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
If radiological evidence from Dr. Sclafani's clinic and others all over the place, and Dr. Haacke's MR has not swayed them what will? Where do they think these pictures all over the Internet are coming from? photo-shop?

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:20 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 823
all of this is not possible if not for the foresight and courage of those that have donated their body to science. We cannot thank them enough . They are true hero's.


Mr.Success


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:05 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2684
Location: Sydney, Australia
I cant help but giggle at their loose use of the term "healthy controls", since they were DEAD! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:24 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 50
Yes there is no way that all this is caused by hydration problems. I always drank a ton of water (yes I do have to get up to pee in the night) and both my jugulars were severely stenosed!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:27 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Cece wrote:
Quote:
Marked valvular and other intraluminal abnormalities with potential hemodynamic consequences were identified in 5 of 7 MS patients (7 abnormalities) and in 1 of 6 controls (1 abnormality). These abnormalities included circumferential membranous structures (1 MS and 1 control), longitudinally-oriented membranous structures (3 MS), single valve flap replacing IJV valve (2 MS), and enlarged and malpositioned valve leaflets (1 MS). In addition, minor anatomic variations without expected hemodynamic consequences were observed similarly in both MS and controls. These included valves with >2 leaflets, the presence of valves in the AZY, additional (duplicate) normal-appearing IJV valves, and small membranous septa.

This is excellent. Since we are looking at visible structural abnormalities, it is hard to argue with autopsy results.

They found more of the longitudinally-oriented membranous structures (aka septums) than what we usually hear about here. Perhaps these are underdiagnosed in patients? Could they be missed on IVUS?

Perhaps it is what we call elongated valves.
Perhaps some of the images interpreted as valves are septums. I think so.
perhaps with flow the septum is collapsed against the wall during venography and not visible.

Quote:
A single valve flap replacing IJV valve might be how you'd describe my left jugular issue, unless it were better described as an enlarged valve leaflet. Finding only three valve abnormalities total in seven MS patients (14 jugulars) is fewer than what the IRs are seeing in living patients.


It is likely that autopsy is going to miss many of the malfunctioning valves because they fixed the tissue. Thus they are seeing only anatomical derangements, but not seeing mobility challenges. Many of the valvular problems seen with IVUS represent immobile valves. During a real time physiological analysis, one seems that the valve opens incompletely and the stenosis is present. I do not think that autopsy will detect these problems.

Quote:
But this is clear support of the association between CCSVI intraluminal abnormalities and MS. It also helps clarify why there might be so much difficulty finding CCSVI, if the imaging studies are failing to differentiate between venous wall stenoses, which were found equally in both the MS patients and controls, and the intraluminal abnormalities, which were overwhelmingly found in the MS patients.


therefore emphasizing the importance of a real time intraluminal interrogation of the veins with IVUS.

_________________
Salvatore JA Sclafani MD
Patient contact: ccsviliberation@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Brooklyn, New York
cheerleader wrote:
Here is Dr. Fox from ECTRIMS, doing a video interview for the MS Society, discussing his study....
this is big news, folks. A major neurologist from Cleveland Clinic finding venous malformations in autopsied jugular veins in pwMS, discussing the importance of correctly done ultrasound testing in CCSVI research. He has consulted with Dr. Zamboni and BNAC.

This may be the beginning of the tide turning....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSijkNDCotA


cheer


I am waiting for some of the neurologists in the original Neurology rebuttal to zamboni to announce that they had discovered the concept of CCSVI.

_________________
Salvatore JA Sclafani MD
Patient contact: ccsviliberation@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:46 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Brooklyn, New York
PointsNorth wrote:
Hmmmm. One group sees 100%, the other 0%. In papers by Simka et.al. involving 000s of people we see a number north of 90%. And neurologists still think their opinion matters . . . . well I guess maybe to the MS Society.


Yes, apparently the data is ignored in favor of the urban legend that zamboni found ccsvi in 100% of PwMS and that none of the healthy controls had CCSVI. Apparently his stating that having only one of the five criteria did not separate the MS cohort from the HC cohort and that the presence of two of the criteria is necessary for a diagnosis of CCSVI gets ignored.

_________________
Salvatore JA Sclafani MD
Patient contact: ccsviliberation@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Study-710 pwMS, 86% have CCSVI

cheerleader

0

651

Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:08 pm

cheerleader View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. NEW: independent doppler study shows CCSVI in 91.5% of pwMS

cheerleader

1

654

Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:31 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. new Serbian study finds CCSVI by ultrasound in pwMS

Cece

1

287

Wed May 16, 2012 1:22 pm

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any PWMS would consider JUST having CCSVI and no RX?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

CuriousRobot

27

1373

Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:44 pm

Thekla View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Poll: have 2000+ pwMS been de-stenosed?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

MarkW

45

4520

Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:08 am

MarkW View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: