More evidence refuting the mainstream MS theory

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

More evidence refuting the mainstream MS theory

Postby tzootsi » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:21 pm

User avatar
tzootsi
Family Elder
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:00 pm

Advertisement

Re: More evidence refuting the mainstream MS theory

Postby 1eye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:51 pm

Says spinal fluid contains unusual proteins. Too early to say why. Still concentrating on early disease (before damage becomes permanent). I don't know about you, but most injuries, I have been able to heal somewhat, after the insult is gone. I hate being so easily written off. Interesting to me that spinal fluid comes from, and returns to, blood. Is it venous blood, or just any blood? Could the stagnation caused by bad venous drainage be allowing these proteins to form? Could a pathogen, perhaps hiding in a biofilm, living in non-laminar, low speed, partly turbulent blood, be creating them? Can they be found also in venous blood? Maybe the BBB has something to do with them. Maybe they are human endogenous retroviri (HERV). Maybe we know more than we thought we did.
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience
User avatar
1eye
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2852
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada


Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users