IVIG - not effective

A board to discuss future MS therapies in early stage (Phase I or II) trials.

IVIG - not effective

Postby bromley » Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:20 am

Intravenous immunoglobulin in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a dose-finding trial 28 July 2008


Several studies have reported a reduction of relapses after the long-term administration of IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) to patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but they were mostly small and differed in terms of predefined outcome variables and treatment regimen. We therefore set out to test two different doses of a new formulation of immunoglobulin termed IGIV-C 10% for suppression of both clinical and MRI disease activity as well as safety.


One hundred twenty-seven patients with RRMS participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-four and 42 patients received treatment with 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg of IGIV-C 10%, and 41 patients received an equal volume of placebo (0.1% albumin) every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of relapse-free patients. The main secondary endpoint was lesion activity assessed by 6-weekly MRI.


Baseline variables were similar in IVIG- and placebo-treated groups. After 1 year, the proportion of relapse-free patients did not differ statistically according to treatment (IVIG 0.2 g/kg: 57%; IVIG 0.4 g/kg: 60%; placebo: 68%), and there was no difference regarding the cumulative number of unique newly active MRI lesions (median numbers: IVIG 0.2 g/kg: 8.0; IVIG 0.4 g/kg: 5.0; placebo: 7.2) after 48 weeks. There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of adverse events.


Although IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment was well tolerated, this study did not substantiate a beneficial effect of IVIG in doses ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 g/kg. This result seriously questions the utility of IVIG for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Fazekas F, Lublin FD, Li D, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Rieckmann P, Sørensen PS, Maas-Enriquez M, Sommerauer B, Hanna K; PRIVIG Study Group; UBC MS/MRI Research Group.
Collaborators (42)

Rice G, Duquette P, Freedman MS, Panitch H, Coyle P, Vollmer T, Jefferey D, Strasser-Fuchs S, Rektor I, Stourac P, Havrdová E, Meluzínová E, Haas J, Hartung HP, Wolfgang H, Oschmann P, Kiefer R, Haller P, Tumani H, Gold R, Papadimitriou A, Komoly S, Jakab G, Harcos P, Vécsei L, Miller A, Wajgt A, Selmaj K, Stelmasiak Z, Kotowicz J, Constantinescu C, Cheng Y, Faber R, Han J, Lagroix L, Li D, Medina M, Riddehough A, Traboulsee A, To A, Yu R, Zhao G.

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

Source: Neurology. 2008 Jul 22;71(4):265-71
User avatar
Family Elder
Posts: 1888
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:00 pm


Postby cheerleader » Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:16 am

Thanks, Bromley.
Dang. This was a big study. Was hoping they'd see better results, maybe in folks where MS had a vascular component. Maybe it's just this new formulation? IGIV-C was created because it costs less. Maybe it's less effective than good ole IGIV?

"Materials and MethodsThe new process combines multiple functions in single steps. Caprylate is added to precipitate non-IgG proteins and to inactivate enveloped viruses. Two successive anion-exchange columns are used to purify IgG and remove caprylate. The new product, IGIV-C (Gamunex™, 10%) is formulated with glycine at 100 mg/ml IgG, pH 4·25. Vials are incubated for 21 days at 23–27 °C in a final virus-inactivation step."

Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
User avatar
Family Elder
Posts: 5358
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: southern California


Postby TeresaL » Fri Mar 27, 2015 8:31 pm

I have been taking a higher dose than what was used in the MS study. I am sure that would make a difference. I'm taking Gammanex C
Family Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:14 pm

Re: IVIG - not effective

Postby centenarian100 » Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:57 pm

There is pretty overwhelming evidence that IVIG is ineffective in multiple sclerosis.

Here are some articles with negative trials:

1) “Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: common and divergent current and future strategies.”; 2014 Mar;175(3):359-72. doi: 10.1111/cei.12195.; Melzer N1, Meuth SG.
2) “IV immunoglobulins as add-on treatment to methylprednisolone for acute relapses in MS.” Sorensen PS, Haas J, Sellebjerg F, Olsson T, Ravnborg M. ; Neurology. 2004;63:2028–2033.
3) “Intravenous immunoglobulin in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a dose-finding trial.”; Fazekas F, Lublin FD, Li D, et al.; Neurology. 2008;71:265–271.
4) “Intravenous immunoglobulin in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: randomised placebo-controlled trial. “ Hommes OR, Sorensen PS, Fazekas F, et al. ; Lancet. 2004;364:1149–1156.
Family Elder
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:51 am

Return to Drug Pipeline


  • Related topics
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Contact us | Terms of Service