This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 11:32 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:34 pm 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 2717
Here's an interesting article on the health risks of nanotechnology.


Amid Nanotech's Dazzling Promise, Health Risks Grow

Quote:
For almost two years, molecular biologist Bénédicte Trouiller doused the drinking water of scores of lab mice with nano-titanium dioxide, the most common nanomaterial used in consumer products today.

She knew that earlier studies conducted in test tubes and petri dishes had shown the same particle could cause disease. But her tests at a lab at UCLA's School of Public Health were in vivo -- conducted in living organisms -- and thus regarded by some scientists as more relevant in assessing potential human harm.

Halfway through, Trouiller became alarmed: Consuming the nano-titanium dioxide was damaging or destroying the animals' DNA and chromosomes. The biological havoc continued as she repeated the studies again and again. It was a significant finding: The degrees of DNA damage and genetic instability that the 32-year-old investigator documented can be "linked to all the big killers of man, namely cancer, heart disease, neurological disease and aging," says Professor Robert Schiestl, a genetic toxicologist who ran the lab at UCLA's School of Public Health where Trouiller did her research.


The article continues at <link>. Parts 2 & 3 of this series on nanotechnology can be found at <link>.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 763
Location: NYC
Thanks for posting this NHE
Interesting, i had just purchased a lipstick in the health store, hemp oil based, all natural--thinking it would be so much better than the usual ones. So I just checked the label--sure enough, titanium dioxide!(as well as iron oxide, which we MSer's surely don't need :? )-
frightening what gets done to us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:18 pm 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 2717
shye wrote:
Thanks for posting this NHE
Interesting, i had just purchased a lipstick in the health store, hemp oil based, all natural--thinking it would be so much better than the usual ones. So I just checked the label--sure enough, titanium dioxide! (as well as iron oxide, which we MSer's surely don't need :? )-
frightening what gets done to us.


According to the series of articles, normal titanium dioxide is inert and should not be a hazard. The problem is that nano scale particulates of titanium dioxide behave differently and that the FDA currently does not require labeling to distinguish between the two. Therefore, nano scale titanium dioxide particulates fall under "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) distinction even though they have been shown to be carcinogenic.

NHE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:53 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne, Australia
if your cosmetic product is clear after applied, it's likely it contains the nano-particles. Nano particles are often included to provide a sunscreen factor, without the opacity that would come from including bigger particles.

For instance, zinc cream has regular sized particles. Sunscreens like "invisible zinc", and some of the Olay range, have zinc nanoparticles.

The nanoparticles are much more expensive than regular sized particles, so tend to be used in premium products.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:55 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 763
Location: NYC
hwebb-
thanks for the clarification-- I will actually email the company and find out for sure (seems to be the nano, since pretty clear)--and will check other products from now on, and likewise inquire from the producer--
and if turns out is nano, will let them know they lost a customer, and why.
If companies start getting inquiries about this, and then complaints and lost business, they will soon catch on that the consumer is concerned.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 902
You just can't trust any products anymore :(


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. nanotechnology

bromley

0

757

Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:41 pm

bromley View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Nanotechnology collaboration

dignan

0

737

Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:04 am

dignan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Using nanotechnology to grow cells

TwistedHelix

0

746

Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:50 am

TwistedHelix View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Nanotechnology and spinal cord repair

TwistedHelix

0

862

Tue May 22, 2007 5:15 am

TwistedHelix View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Revolutionary nanotechnology illuminates brain cells at work

dignan

0

761

Tue May 31, 2005 9:52 pm

dignan View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: