Should CIS be considered MS? If we assume that MS is the presence of multiple scars, just one lesion should not be considered MS.
On the other hand, normally MS refers the underlying condition that produces the scars. From this point of view CIS should be inside MS when is expected to evolve into clinical MS.
What do you think? What should be the proper way to classify CIS?
should CIS be considered MS?
If it's on your mind and it has to do with multiple sclerosis in any way, post it here.
Return to “General Discussion”
Jump to
- Multiple Sclerosis
- ↳ General Discussion
- ↳ Introductions
- ↳ Drug Pipeline
- ↳ Regimens
- ↳ Undiagnosed
- ↳ MS Etiology and Pathogenesis
- Treatments
- ↳ Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)
- ↳ Low Dose Naltrexone
- ↳ Tysabri (Antegren, Natalizumab)
- ↳ Copaxone
- ↳ Glatopa
- ↳ Avonex
- ↳ Rebif
- ↳ Betaseron
- ↳ Plegridy
- ↳ Novantrone
- ↳ Aimspro
- ↳ Diet
- ↳ Stem Cells
- ↳ Antibiotics
- ↳ Campath (Lemtrada, Alemtuzumab)
- ↳ Gene Therapy
- ↳ Natural Approach
- ↳ Biotin (Qizenday, Cerenday, MD1003)
- ↳ Coimbra High-Dose Vitamin D Protocol
- ↳ Statins
- ↳ Tcelna (Tovaxin)
- ↳ Revimmune (Cyclophosphamide, Cytoxan)
- ↳ Medical Devices
- ↳ Rituxan (Rituximab)
- ↳ Ocrevus (Ocrelizumab)
- ↳ Kesimpta (Ofatumumab)
- ↳ Briumvi (Ublituximab-xiiy)
- ↳ General Medications
- ↳ Tecfidera (BG-12, Dimethyl fumarate)
- ↳ Vumerity (Diroximel fumarate)
- ↳ Bafiertam (Monomethyl fumarate)
- ↳ Gilenya
- ↳ Aubagio (Teriflunomide)
- ↳ Mayzent (Siponimod)
- ↳ Zeposia (Ozanimod)
- ↳ Ponvory (Ponesimod)
- ↳ Mavenclad (Cladribine)
- ↳ Ampyra (Dalfampridine)
- ↳ Medical Marijuana
- ↳ Sativex
- ↳ Chiropractic Treatment
- Life
- ↳ Daily Life
- ↳ Veterans and MS
- ↳ Trigeminal Neuralgia in MS
- ↳ Reading Nook
- ↳ Humor
- ↳ Shopping
- ↳ Friends and Family
- ↳ Mental & Spiritual Health
- ↳ Exercise and Physical Therapy
- ↳ Under 25 with MS
- ↳ MS in the Golden Years
- ↳ Parenting Kids With MS
- ↳ Parents with MS
- ThisIsMS.com
- ↳ Site Support
- ↳ Suggestions