This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 2:07 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Rehab
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:25 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 1610
No, not that kind of rehab...

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Intervention in persons with Multiple sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 5.
Khan F, Pallant JF, Brand C, Kilpatrick TJ.
Deaprtment of rehabilitation Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia.

OBJECTIVE: A stratified, randomized, waitlist controlled study over 12 months assessed the effectiveness of rehabilitation in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in an Australian community cohort.

METHODS: Patients with definite MS (n=101) recruited from a tertiary hospital database, randomized to a treatment group (n=49) for individualized rehabilitation programme, or a control waitlist group (n=52). Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used to assess activity, while Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28 ) assessed participation and quality of life (QoL). Assessments were at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS: Analysis of data from 98 patients (treatment n=48, control n=50) showed reduced disability in the treatment group, with statistically significant differences in post-treatment FIM Motor scores for the two groups ( p<.001). There was a clinical and statistically significant improvement in FIM (Motor) total scores (p<.001), and the FIM Motor domains of : transfer (p<.001), locomotion (p<.001), self care (p<.001), and the FIM cognitive subscale (p<.016). In the treated group 70.8% improved, compared with 13% of the controls. Significantly more patients in the control group deteriorated over the study period (58.7% versus 16.7%: p<.001). There were no differences between control and treatment group scores on the MSIS-Physical (p=.18 ), MSIS-Psychological (p=.45) or GHQ subscales.

CONCLUSION: An individualized rehabilitation programme reduces disability in persons with MS compared to no intervention. The impact of rehabilitation on QoL needs further evaluation. More information on effectiveness of the various components of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes are now needed.

Pubmed link


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers