all things vitamin D

Discuss herbal therapies, vitamins and minerals, bee stings, etc. here

Postby robbie » Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:18 am

what about the people that are in the sun all the time and their d levels are at the max but still get ms?
Had ms for over 19 years now.
User avatar
robbie
Family Elder
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada

Advertisement

Postby cheerleader » Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:30 am

I think it's important to understand what this research claims- it's looking at MS prevention thru pregnancy and childhood intervention with vitamin D supplementation. Here's a breakdown of the study -

1) So far, the largest genetic correlation researchers have found towards developing MS comes from chromosome six (which contains the gene variant known as DRB1*1501)

2) The researchers found that proteins activated by vitamin D in the body bind to a particular DNA sequence lying next to the DRB1*1501 variant, in effect switching the gene on, making MS more likely to occur.

3) In people with the DRB1 variant associated with MS, vitamin D plays a critical role- if too little of the vitamin is available during childhood, the gene may not function properly later.

4) The researchers hypothesize that this gene-environmental interaction may affect the ability of the thymus. The thymus produces millions of different T cells, each designed to recognize a specific pathogen, but there is a risk that one type might mistakenly identify one of the body's own myelin and create MS.

Ebers has been looking at vitamin D and this specific gene for years- he hasn't been looking for "a cure" or "the one reason MS occurs." This is just another piece of the puzzle...and gives more weight to the vit. D discussion.
AC
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com
User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
 
Posts: 5342
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: southern California

Professor Ebers Vit D

Postby bromley » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:23 pm

I think I posted this in Summer 2007, but given today's research the talk by Professor Ebers may be of interest.

Ian

<shortened url>
User avatar
bromley
Family Elder
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:00 pm

Postby JoR » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:34 pm

Apologies for jumping in but this has been the first article that has compelled me to post instead of just lurking; does anyone know what Vitamin D supplement I should buy my 3 year olds? I have MS and I live in the UK (dim and dark North!) and feel this is something I cannot afford to ignore. I am unsure at what level I should be giving children so young and where I would be able to get it but any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Sorry if this is not an appropriate question to ask and please disregard if this is so however I ask out of concern for my children.

Many thanks

Jo :?
User avatar
JoR
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:00 pm
Location: UK

Postby jimmylegs » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:45 pm

JoR you should be able to get a nice tasty baby liquid. do not neglect to balance any d3 supplementation plan with calcium and magnesium and zinc, all at appropriate levels for tiny bodies. you cannot give it all at the same time either because the minerals need some alone time with your body, it can't all be d3 interactions you know!
i think you'd be safe to say that if adults take 4000IU per day and weigh an average of 70kg, then scale back the dosage of d3 and the minerals relative to the kg weight of your child.
if you can't get an off-the-shelf liquid that fits the bill, you may be able to get the chemist to dilute a stronger liquid for you.
just be careful - that kind of thing you may need to keep in the refridgerator so it's not so easy to keep up high or locked.
if they are old enough to take pills it's really easy to get 1000 or 2000IU pills that are small and simple to take.
monitor the little ones' bloodwork to ensure it gets where you want it to be, but does not go too high. in one study where vitamin d3 status in adults was measured, the group with the lowest incidence of ms had serum levels 100 nmol/L and higher. if levels go too high you can expect side effects like hypercalcaemia and such so probably best to keep the max level under 150 until there is more research completed on optimal d3 status.
jimmylegs
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 9568
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm

Postby cheerleader » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:35 pm

robbie wrote:http://s90.photobucket.com/albums/k280/seara_01/?action=view&current=115113.flv


Hey Robbie...
Glad you're posting videos, since typing is getting harder for you. It's always good to see you. You bring up a really important question-
Why would folks who get plenty of sunshine get MS? I asked the same question about my husband, who grew up in the California sun, and was very outdoorsy. He even has basal cells (pre-skin cancer) to prove it!
I guess what the study is showing is that in people who have this genetic variant, a lack of vitamin D in their mother's wombs or childhood can turn on the MS process which will show up later in life.
This is just a good reminder for pregnant Moms to get enough vitamin D, and for Moms with MS in the family to make sure their kids get it, too. It's more about an ounce of prevention....
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com
User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
 
Posts: 5342
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: southern California

Welcome, JoR

Postby lyndacarol » Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:41 pm

JoR--Before you begin administering D3 to your 3-year-olds, it would seem wise to find an endocrinologist to order tests to learn their D3 levels. (JimmyLegs can teach you all about Vitamin D and which exact test to request.)

And welcome to the site! You'll find a friendly, helpful community here.
User avatar
lyndacarol
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2952
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:00 pm

More vitamin D news

Postby NHE » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:39 am

I'm not sure if this has already been posted, but here's another recent article on vitamin D...


Lack of sunshine found to trigger MS

Research finds people with gene variant who lack vitamin D, produced from sun exposure, can develop condition

Women who are not exposed to sufficient sunshine in pregnancy may be at risk of giving birth to a child who will get multiple sclerosis in adulthood, research reveals today.

Oxford University researchers have identified a link between a shortage of the "sunshine vitamin" – vitamin D – and a specific gene which appears to be involved in the onset of the devastating and incurable disease.

Women are already urged to take folic acid in pregnancy to reduce the chances of a child being born with spina bifida. The research findings suggest that vitamin D could before long be advised for pregnant women as well – especially those who do not get much exposure to sunlight. The researchers think it is possible that vitamin D could play a part in other diseases whcih affect the immune system too.

"Our study implies that taking vitamin D supplements during pregnancy and the early years may reduce the risk of a child developing MS later in life," said lead author Dr Sreeram Ramagopalan. "Vitamin D is a safe and relatively cheap supplement with substantial potential health benefits. There is accumulating evidence that it can reduce the risk of developing cancer and offer protection from other autoimmune diseases."

Their work, published today in the journal PLoS Genetics, breaks new ground by revealing the interaction between a gene and an environmental factor – in this case, exposure to sunlight.

It has long been suspected that sunshine played a part in the condition's development. MS, the most common disabling neurological condition, affects 85,000 mainly young adults in the UK and 2.5 million worldwide and is markedly more common in cloudy northern climates. Scotland has a significantly higher concentration of MS cases than England.

A gene variant known as DRB1*1501 has been implicated in MS. While one in 1000 people in the general population develop the disease, it is one in 300 among those who have one copy of this gene variant and one in 100 of those who have two copies.

The Oxford study has found a direct relationship between vitamin D, produced in the body as a result of sun exposure, and this gene variant. In effect, proteins activated by vitamin D in the body switch the gene on. It appears, they say, that if people get too little sunshine, the gene may not function properly.

This interaction between gene and environment – so-called "epigenetics" – is being seen as increasingly important by scientists: that genetic make-up is not set in stone from conception, but is influenced for better or worse by the world around us.

"Epigenetics will have important implications, not only for MS, but for other common diseases," said Professor George Ebers, from the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics at Oxford, where the work was done. "For mothers, taking care of their health during their reproductive years may have beneficial effects on the health of their future children or even grandchildren."

· This article was amended on Friday 6 February 2009. George Ebers does not run the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics at Oxford. This has been corrected.
User avatar
NHE
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 3911
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm

Postby furch » Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:37 am

"Our findings are corroborated by previous observations that UV light has a preventive role in the development of MS, although the possibility of reversed causality cannot be completely ruled out. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2009 (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc."

<shortened url>

so vitamin d can actually cause MS? theres no question that its significant in ms - but obviously not in a "the more the better" kind of way.. if so the epidemic of autoimmune disease would be decreasing with the amount of supplementation in the food chain..
User avatar
furch
Getting to Know You...
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:00 pm

Postby jimmylegs » Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:27 am

reversed causality means that rather than d3 deficiency causing ms, ms causes d3 deficiency. my neuro has thrown that at me regarding uric acid.
there've been some good n-sized studies where they looked at d status and ms risk and the quintile with d3 levels over 100 nmol/L had the lowest risk. the average person with osteoporosis probably has levels in the 70s or lower.
jimmylegs
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 9568
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm

Postby Terry » Sun Feb 08, 2009 8:23 am

http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=20010214043340

Lengthy- sorry.

UV-B The ultraviolet wavelength that stimulates our bodies to produce vitamin D is UV-B.


The reason it is difficult to get adequate vitamin D from sunlight is that while UV-A is present throughout the day, the amount of UV-B present has to do with the angle of the sun's rays. Thus, at higher latitudes, UV-B is present only during midday hours and only has significant intensity in temperate or tropical latitudes. Only 5 percent of the UV-B light range goes through glass and it does not penetrate clouds, smog or fog.
Sun exposure at higher latitudes before 10 am or after 2 pm will cause burning from UV-A before it will supply adequate vitamin D from UV-B. This finding may surprise you, as it did the researchers. It means that sunning must occur between the hours we have been told to avoid. Only sunning between 10 am and 2 pm during summer months (or winter months in southern latitudes) for 20-120 minutes, depending on skin type and color, will form adequate vitamin D before burning occurs.(9)
It takes about 24 hours for UV-B-stimulated vitamin D to show up as maximum levels of vitamin D in the blood. Cholesterol-containing body oils are critical to this absorption process.(10) Because the body needs 30-60 minutes to absorb these vitamin-D-containing oils, it is best to delay showering or bathing for one hour after exposure. The skin oils in which vitamin D is produced can also be removed by chlorine in swimming pools.


If you have symptoms of vitamin D insufficiency or are unable to spend time in the sun, consider adding a supplement of 2,000 IU daily. Higher levels may be needed but should be recommended and monitored by your health care practitioner.


Adequate calcium and magnesium, as well as other minerals, are critical parts of vitamin D therapy. Without calcium and magnesium in sufficient quantities, vitamin D supplementation will withdraw calcium from the bone and will allow the uptake of toxic minerals. Do not supplement vitamin D and do not sunbathe unless you are sure you have sufficient calcium and magnesium to meet your daily needs. Weston Price suggested a minimum of 1,200-2,400 mg of calcium daily. Research suggests that 1,200-1,500 mg is adequate as a supplement for most adults, both men and women. (Magnesium intake should be half that of calcium.)


In my experience, high, infrequent dosing can lead to problems. In one recent study, blood levels rose from low to extremely high, (more than 300 nmol/l) 24 hours after a 50,000 IU oral dose,65 and then slowly returned to pretreatment suboptimal levels. Clearly this must disrupt normal feedback mechanisms in D and calcium regulation


Jimmy,
I have been taking D3- 5,000 iu.
I went from 2x a week (per doc instructions) to almost daily this last week. (and felt better) I have added no calcium. I take mag.
Please tell me again how much of these you take and how often.

Terry
User avatar
Terry
Family Elder
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:00 pm

Postby DIM » Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:53 pm

Jimmy I give to my wife 5000IU D3 3 times per week with 1200mg Calcium-600mg Magnesium daily.
I don't think the above quantities Cal-Mag aren't enough for the vitamin D3 intake as we take some minerals from our food and we eat 3-4 times per week fishes etc.
User avatar
DIM
Family Elder
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: GREECE

Postby jimmylegs » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:24 pm

i agree dim, those daily cal and mag amounts sound good.
that's what i try for too terry, 1200mg Ca and 600mg Mg daily.
jimmylegs
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 9568
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm

Postby Terry » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:54 pm

Thanks JL.
User avatar
Terry
Family Elder
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:00 pm

Postby Frank » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:39 pm

As far as I remember, previous research had shown that people with MS do NOT have eleviated levels of autoreactive T-Cells compared to healthy controls.

How can that be consistent with the new findings regarding a flawed selection process in the thymus?

Wouldn't the quantities of autoreactive T-cells be a benchmark for that theory?

--Frank
Treatment: Gilenya since 01/2011, CCSVI both IJV ballooned 09/2010, Tysabri stopped after 24 Infusions and positive JCV antibody test, after LDN, ABX Wheldon Regime for 1 year.
Frank
Family Elder
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

PreviousNext

Return to Natural Approach

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


Contact us | Terms of Service