.. I sure hope you have your bag packed ;)Cece wrote:Again I'm struck that your patients are very fortunate to be your patients. And we are very conscious of it.
CCSVI@aac-llc.com, quickly, everyone....
Happy Thanksgiving

.. I sure hope you have your bag packed ;)Cece wrote:Again I'm struck that your patients are very fortunate to be your patients. And we are very conscious of it.
CCSVI@aac-llc.com, quickly, everyone....
Dr. S., this is concerning. It seems to suggest that angioplasty might triggers hyperplasia which might totally clog up the veins.dania wrote:Dr Sclafani is there any way of preventing Intimal Hyperplasia? I have had the procedure done twice, Got some great improvements that disappeared after 1 week. With the third attempt all 3 veins are now 100% blocked. It seems usless to keep trying without addressing this problem first.
I developed clots in the 1 stent I had but the other 2 veins had only been angioplastied and there were no clots in those 2. But they were now closed completely.fogdweller wrote:Dr. S., this is concerning. It seems to suggest that angioplasty might triggers hyperplasia which might totally clog up the veins.dania wrote:Dr Sclafani is there any way of preventing Intimal Hyperplasia? I have had the procedure done twice, Got some great improvements that disappeared after 1 week. With the third attempt all 3 veins are now 100% blocked. It seems usless to keep trying without addressing this problem first.
I, too had improvements for a short time, 3 days or so, that faded. I am probably not worse now, but certainly not better. I had reason to believe that I had restenosed fairly quickly, perhaps with thrombosis ( does that happen? Does thrombosis cause long term restenosis of sorts?). Is it possible that retreatment makes the problem worse?
Dr. Scalafani,drsclafani wrote:jim
Finally, the venogram after this angioplasty shows some filing defects but the flow was phenomenal. I believe the filling defect is a detached part of the valve.
Dr Sclafani,
Those are beautiful images. Is the use of high pressure ballons common. Are those images from someone local? I really want to meet this gal or guy.
Jim
are you referring to the doctor or the patient![]()
I do not think that the use of high pressure balloons is common. They are 2 or 3 times more expensive
Here's a link to Dania's thread, I don't suppose there's been any solution?fogdweller wrote:Dr. S., this is concerning. It seems to suggest that angioplasty might triggers hyperplasia which might totally clog up the veins.dania wrote:Dr Sclafani is there any way of preventing Intimal Hyperplasia? I have had the procedure done twice, Got some great improvements that disappeared after 1 week. With the third attempt all 3 veins are now 100% blocked. It seems usless to keep trying without addressing this problem first.
I, too had improvements for a short time, 3 days or so, that faded. I am probably not worse now, but certainly not better. I had reason to believe that I had restenosed fairly quickly, perhaps with thrombosis ( does that happen? Does thrombosis cause long term restenosis of sorts?). Is it possible that retreatment makes the problem worse?
Thank-you, Cece. As always, very helpful. I guess the answer is yes. The original stenosis is probably structural, maybe congential formation. After angioplasty the patient (me) may experience hyperplasia, which could result in a stenosis worse than the original structural blockage. bummer. Makes follow-up even more important, and as yet I have had no luck in getting that and it has been almost 2 months. I am still trying to get an itemized bill out of Pacific Interventionalists so I can bill my insurance company. I guess once they got payment, I wasn't much of a priority.Cece wrote:Here's a link to Dania's thread, I don't suppose there's been any solution?fogdweller wrote:Dr. S., this is concerning. It seems to suggest that angioplasty might triggers hyperplasia which might totally clog up the veins.dania wrote:Dr Sclafani is there any way of preventing Intimal Hyperplasia? I have had the procedure done twice, Got some great improvements that disappeared after 1 week. With the third attempt all 3 veins are now 100% blocked. It seems usless to keep trying without addressing this problem first.
I, too had improvements for a short time, 3 days or so, that faded. I am probably not worse now, but certainly not better. I had reason to believe that I had restenosed fairly quickly, perhaps with thrombosis ( does that happen? Does thrombosis cause long term restenosis of sorts?). Is it possible that retreatment makes the problem worse?
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-14158-da ... asc-0.html
Fogdweller, she had hypercoaguability issues, so it's a more rare situation. Dr. Sclafani commented on it here:
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-138503.html#138503
Okay that makes mefogdweller wrote:Thank-you, Cece. As always, very helpful. I guess the answer is yes. The original stenosis is probably structural, maybe congential formation. After angioplasty the patient (me) may experience hyperplasia, which could result in a stenosis worse than the original structural blockage. bummer. Makes follow-up even more important, and as yet I have had no luck in getting that and it has been almost 2 months. I am still trying to get an itemized bill out of Pacific Interventionalists so I can bill my insurance company. I guess once they got payment, I wasn't much of a priority.
daniadania wrote:Dr Sclafani is there any way of preventing Intimal Hyperplasia? I have had the procedure done twice, Got some great improvements that disappeared after 1 week. With the third attempt all 3 veins are now 100% blocked. It seems usless to keep trying without addressing this problem first.