Alberta Health Services statement on CCSVI

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
Post Reply
User avatar
happydance
Family Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Contact:

Alberta Health Services statement on CCSVI

Post by happydance »

User avatar
fiddler
Family Elder
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Fredericton, Canada
Contact:

Abuse

Post by fiddler »

Yes, another example of how the sloppy wording in the BNAC study press release encourages abuse.
...Ted
Dx SPMS in 2004.  Liberated 29/04/2010.
My blog: www.my-darn-ms.blogspot.com
User avatar
nicko
Family Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:00 pm
Contact:

Post by nicko »

In his second study, Dr. Zamboni performed venous angioplasty on MS patients with coexistent CCSVI (as defined in his first study). Although the percentage of patients who were symptom-free was reported to have increased after venous angioplasty, the actual annualized relapse rate for the entire group remained unchanged. These findings, which appear somewhat contradictory, are likely explained by a small number of people having more relapses after intervention and / or by differences in the period of observation before and after the procedure. Nonetheless, the relapse outcomes do not clearly support a clinical benefit of venous angioplasty.
His second study???? They are classifying the angioplasty as a second study? Also didn't I read in Zamboni's original study that the angioplasty failed 47% of the time? meaning re-occurrence of symptoms and relapses in those patients? they don't seem to mention that when the angioplasty was successful the disease did not progress.
Post Reply

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”