Dear Dr. Sclafani,
I don't know if this is of any help, but at least the small german study must be heavily argued. They declare that the corresponding author, Dr. Krogias, has no conflicts of interest. Yet they fail to tell that at least two other researchers, Dr. Gold and Dr. Hohlfeld, have severe conflicts of interest, receiving money not from one but from ALL DMD producing Pharma groups. But even more compelling is, exactly those reseachers of the study form the medical advisory board of the german MS society (DMSG), who has published the most dismissive statement in december, telling that Dr. Zamboni's work is "worthless and even ethically questionable". (I translated it here:
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-79494.html ) There's no way to think that they were unbiased. On the contrary, they would have proven themselves wrong if there would have been any other outcome of the study.
I really really hope there's a satisfying solution for you anytime soon!
Greetings and also a big thank you from across the pond
Cah
P.S.: The german MS society has published a new report yesterday. They use their own study, the other german/british study, and the BNAC study in a negative way. Nothing else is mentioned. Oh wait, they also mention one death due to the treatment in the USA.

And they tell that all MS societies in the world agree to discourage people from CCSVI treatment. I don't know what direct MS, reformed MS, CCSVI alliance, MSRC etc. are, but they must be something else. (I will translate their new article when I find the time, maybe this weekend.)