Review: The currently accepted MS models do not need Tcells

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
Post Reply
User avatar
frodo
Family Elder
Posts: 1784
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:00 pm
Contact:

Review: The currently accepted MS models do not need Tcells

Post by frodo »

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/15/219

Background

Although the precise mechanism of initial lesion development in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unclear, two different neuropathological findings have been reported as a potential early pathology of MS: “microglial nodules” and “newly forming lesions”, both of which contain neither T cell infiltration nor demyelination.

In microglial nodules, damaged axons were associated with a small number of aggregated macrophages/microglia, while oligodendrocyte apoptosis was a characteristic in newly forming lesions. However, is the presence of “microglial nodules” and “oligodendrogliopathy” mutually exclusive? Might these two different observations be the same neuropathology (as proposed by the concept, “preactive lesions”), but interpreted differently based on the different theories of early MS lesion development, using different staining methods?
Post Reply

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”