Distinguishing reference intervals and clinical decision limits - A review by the IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (2018)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30047297
"Reference Intervals (RIs) and clinical decision limits (CDLs) are a vital part of the information supplied by laboratories to support the interpretation of numerical clinical pathology results. RIs describe the typical distribution of results seen in a healthy reference population while CDLs are associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes or are diagnostic for the presence of a specific disease."
let's recall that these reference intervals describe the typical distribution of results seen in a *nominally* healthy reference population, which tends to include both sick and healthy people.
rather than emphasizing *this* is the point at which things are significantly worse, i like to use these the other way around. where's the interval with *lowest* risk of adverse outcomes, and how do i make sure my levels are okay according to that positive CDL. i'm interested in whether my levels (probably moreso in combination/collectively than individually, for that matter) can be considered diagnostic for the presence of health.
reference intervals and clinical decision limits
reference intervals and clinical decision limits
active members shape site content. if there is a problem, speak up!
use the report button to flag problematic post content to volunteer moderators' attention.
use the report button to flag problematic post content to volunteer moderators' attention.