Hi WW,Wonderfulworld wrote:And to throw my area of fascination into the ring...gout and MS are mutually exclusive..............

Are you ever able to find articles regarding the mutual exclusivity of MS and gout?
Bob
Hi WW,Wonderfulworld wrote:And to throw my area of fascination into the ring...gout and MS are mutually exclusive..............
Wilson,wilson wrote:
I was diagnosed four years ago and haven't seen a neurologist in 3.5 years. Unless you are on an Interferon, can anyone think of any reason why we should go and see a neurologist and put up with their rude, boorish behavior?
I recall seeing study results like this. Don't have a direct link though. A paper did a review of all gout research articles and cross referenced it for people with MS. They found zero matches. Whether or not that means anything significant is anyones call, but I think it is what supports some of the uric acid and inosine research.Lyon wrote:Hi WW,Wonderfulworld wrote:And to throw my area of fascination into the ring...gout and MS are mutually exclusive..............
I'm glad that one is your fascination and not mine because it's hard enough to keep my obsession fed with the little pertinent information that is published regarding hygiene hypothesis related stuff.
Are you ever able to find articles regarding the mutual exclusivity of MS and gout?
Bob
Hi WW,Wonderfulworld wrote: My little lad is only 4 weeks old and I'm really tired....sorry to sound so vague but I know I won't have the time to get back into this any time soon!
No, that isn't the reason I questioned you. I remember someone posting information earlier and I know that information exists.Wonderfulworld wrote: I know I shouldn't throw a comment in if I can't back it up.....couldn't help myselfbut maybe someone else with a bit of time can do a bit of delving.
I have to admit that it's so complicated that it's not easy to get interested in. Then again, the term "mutually exclusive" can't help but grab attention. Always and never situation are needed in MS research.Wonderfulworld wrote:In the end I stopped searching for it because it was far more complex than I could deal with.
You could always try Babelfish. It produces somewhat readable translations.Lyon wrote: This isn't the best article to describe current Mexican MS occurance, but I'm finding that most are in Spanish
Hey Bob no that's ok! I didn't take you up that way at all - I'm just irritated with myself for being so vague and normally I'd be more disciplined about knowing what I was posting.Wonderfulworld wrote:I know I shouldn't throw a comment in if I can't back it up.....couldn't help myself Embarassed but maybe someone else with a bit of time can do a bit of delving.Lyon wrote:No, that isn't the reason I questioned you. I remember someone posting information earlier and I know that information exists.
Actually, I just thought you were being too hard on yourself!Wonderfulworld wrote:Hey Bob no that's ok! I didn't take you up that way at all - I'm just irritated with myself for being so vague and normally I'd be more disciplined about knowing what I was posting.Wonderfulworld wrote:I know I shouldn't throw a comment in if I can't back it up.....couldn't help myself Embarassed but maybe someone else with a bit of time can do a bit of delving.Lyon wrote:No, that isn't the reason I questioned you. I remember someone posting information earlier and I know that information exists.