I asked for decency once too many times. Pardon the anger, but that is crap. I'm sure doctors have not just encountered the first venous thrombosis in history, and I think treatment would have been insured if that's what you are concerned about. Sending him back to Costa Rica? That was a much better idea.oreo wrote:Any attempt by a canadian doctor to do something in this situation would have been unauthorized experimental treatment on a human being.Just because a man has an unapproved surgery in a foreign country, does he forfeit his right to emergency medical treatment?
So what if it was a stent? No protocols? Oh good, we've got an excuse for not doing anything, and we can tell him to go back to the travel agency.
... Even if nobody in our province, or country, for that matter, would risk the disapproval of neurologists everywhere and treat him, and said dead person may have felt it was a matter of choosing the quickest treatment available in the closest foreign country. Of course we don't mention those who die every day due to this scrupulous neglect.One of the big problems with some of these foreign treatment locations as I see it is that they do not seem to have any selection criteria other than 'do you have the cash?'. It is a sad reality of any disease that a patient can reach a point where even an accepted course of treatment is no longer a viable option, never mind an entirely experimental one.
There certainly are a lot of sad realities around. ...