we havent shown that we can mature a hypoplastic vein. It is just theoretical. So far, it hasnt workedCece wrote:That's an interesting question. If a hypoplastic vein can be matured, why not a regular vein, even if it wasn't originally the IJV?

My experience as well. In fact, trying may be making things worse.drsclafani wrote:we havent shown that we can mature a hypoplastic vein. It is just theoretical. So far, it hasnt workedCece wrote:That's an interesting question. If a hypoplastic vein can be matured, why not a regular vein, even if it wasn't originally the IJV?
CCSVI ultrasound is not really simply an evaluation of the veins that are interrogated. It is a global view of the hemodynamic status of the cerebrospinal drainage. So if the azygous vein is obstructed, alternate pathways are necessary. Some of those include the vertebral venous plexus, so we might see reversal of flow in the vertebral venous system.sou
Family Elder
Joined: Dec 21, 2008
Posts: 420
Location: Greece
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:53 am Post subject:
Perhaps this is a question for sonographers, but anyway, I shall ask:
Supposing a patient has only azygos (or hemiazygos) stenosis/membranes/etc, what is the sonographic evidence that an ultrasound examination may provide? Can these people be erroneously diagnosed as "healthy"?
_________________
Shortest joke: "We may not be able to cure MS but we can manage its symptoms."
I like your comment "next time" - we're going to have a long-term relationship, doc! Which is OK with me...just need to win the lotterydrsclafani wrote:if they are stenotic, it might make sense to improve the collateral veins. this is the reason for looking for the may thurner syndrome as an alternative pathway for drainage in the presence of azygous stenosis.newlywed4ever wrote:Since I have a LIJV that is occluded due to 1) scar tissue, 2) blood clot or 3) first angio was not actually in the IJV, I am wondering... does it make any sense to balloon maybe one of the larger collaterals if the IJV can't be treated?
IT might make sense to look at your vertebral veins the next time you undergo venography.
But remember that the vertebral veins are small and vulnerable. the external jugular veins may also be collaterals but there are so many of them it would be quite challenging to figure this out.
I am really sorry to read that. I don't think you've had a chance yet with a patient who is local and can have a hypoplastic vein repeatedly treated, a little at a time? It's always been attempted all at once, in a single procedure? Dang it, though...there are a lot of patients with hypoplasia.drsclafani wrote:we havent shown that we can mature a hypoplastic vein. It is just theoretical. So far, it hasnt workedCece wrote:That's an interesting question. If a hypoplastic vein can be matured, why not a regular vein, even if it wasn't originally the IJV?
It really is depressing, I want these ideas to work out, and it seems like it should in theory. But trying could be making it worse.... Dr. Cumming, have you seen these hypoplastic veins? Was it CCSVI jugulars or prior experience with veins elsewhere in the body? Have you seen any that were treated elsewhere?DrCumming wrote:My experience as well. In fact, trying may be making things worse.
This is completely understood. As far as I have read, the vertebral plexus'es flow evaluation is not part of the standard CCSVI diagnostic procedure. Of course, it could be evaluated through scanning the flow of the deep cerebral veins, but what about people having no sonographic window on their skull and these veins can not be scanned? Can the flow of the vertebral or the internal jugular veins reveal any information or an interventional venography is mandatory, in that case?drsclafani wrote:CCSVI ultrasound is not really simply an evaluation of the veins that are interrogated. It is a global view of the hemodynamic status of the cerebrospinal drainage. So if the azygous vein is obstructed, alternate pathways are necessary. Some of those include the vertebral venous plexus, so we might see reversal of flow in the vertebral venous system.sou wrote:Supposing a patient has only azygos (or hemiazygos) stenosis/membranes/etc, what is the sonographic evidence that an ultrasound examination may provide? Can these people be erroneously diagnosed as "healthy"?
no, the vertebral flow is part of the fluid space and hemodynamics reflect derangements of the azygous vein. The ultrasound exam does interrogate the vertebral veins, in addition to the jugular and deep cerebral veins. . It is all one systemsou wrote:This is completely understood. As far as I have read, the vertebral plexus'es flow evaluation is not part of the standard CCSVI diagnostic procedure. Of course, it could be evaluated through scanning the flow of the deep cerebral veins, but what about people having no sonographic window on their skull and these veins can not be scanned? Can the flow of the vertebral or the internal jugular veins reveal any information or an interventional venography is mandatory, in that case?drsclafani wrote:CCSVI ultrasound is not really simply an evaluation of the veins that are interrogated. It is a global view of the hemodynamic status of the cerebrospinal drainage. So if the azygous vein is obstructed, alternate pathways are necessary. Some of those include the vertebral venous plexus, so we might see reversal of flow in the vertebral venous system.sou wrote:Supposing a patient has only azygos (or hemiazygos) stenosis/membranes/etc, what is the sonographic evidence that an ultrasound examination may provide? Can these people be erroneously diagnosed as "healthy"?
laterCece wrote:I am really sorry to read that. I don't think you've had a chance yet with a patient who is local and can have a hypoplastic vein repeatedly treated, a little at a time? It's always been attempted all at once, in a single procedure? Dang it, though...there are a lot of patients with hypoplasia.drsclafani wrote:we havent shown that we can mature a hypoplastic vein. It is just theoretical. So far, it hasnt workedCece wrote:That's an interesting question. If a hypoplastic vein can be matured, why not a regular vein, even if it wasn't originally the IJV?
Have you seen any patients yet with hypoplasia in both jugulars? If a patient presents with hypoplasia on one side, is that a reason to be more cautious with the jugular on the other side (because it's essentially the only one and more is at stake if it is lost or damaged) or more aggressive (because if it's the only one, it needs to be open)?
It really is depressing, I want these ideas to work out, and it seems like it should in theory. But trying could be making it worse.... Dr. Cumming, have you seen these hypoplastic veins? Was it CCSVI jugulars or prior experience with veins elsewhere in the body? Have you seen any that were treated elsewhere?DrCumming wrote:My experience as well. In fact, trying may be making things worse.
We've seen some good images immediately post-procedure, of hypoplastic veins that have increased in size. But what happens then? Clotting, possibly due to poor flow or extensive intimal damage. Could that be met with higher doses of blood thinners? If the vein does not clot but shrinks, could it be looked at with tissue characterization on ivus to see if it is in fact intimal hyperplasia is the problem?
I should always be cautious with any vein. I treat them all with respect.Cece wrote:Have you seen any patients yet with hypoplasia in both jugulars? If a patient presents with hypoplasia on one side, is that a reason to be more cautious with the jugular on the other side (because it's essentially the only one and more is at stake if it is lost or damaged) or more aggressive (because if it's the only one, it needs to be open)?drsclafani wrote:we havent shown that we can mature a hypoplastic vein. It is just theoretical. So far, it hasnt workedCece wrote:That's an interesting question. If a hypoplastic vein can be matured, why not a regular vein, even if it wasn't originally the IJV?
They clot. In some, the hypoplasia extends higher than the balloon can go. So even when the vein is successfully dilated, the slow and meager flow from above is insufficient to maintain patency of the vein.
We've seen some good images immediately post-procedure, of hypoplastic veins that have increased in size. But what happens then? Clotting, possibly due to poor flow or extensive intimal damage. Could that be met with higher doses of blood thinners? If the vein does not clot but shrinks, could it be looked at with tissue characterization on ivus to see if it is in fact intimal hyperplasia is the problem?
I can't think of anything that can be done about that. I suppose get an interventional neuroradiologist involved to balloon the upper areas, but only if they thought it were safe and worth risking, which it doesn't seem to be.drsclafani wrote:They clot. In some, the hypoplasia extends higher than the balloon can go. So even when the vein is successfully dilated, the slow and meager flow from above is insufficient to maintain patency of the vein.
If you're seeing clotting in the short-term, there really isn't any long-term for these veins....I dont think higher doses of anticoagulation will help. Perhaps long term anticoagulation would be more effective.
That is awful.I think sometimes what happens is that we stretch beyond tolerance and the entire vein just "unzips". having no longer any wall strength, the thing just collapses and clots.
i hate to admit it, but i would say trial, and error and experienceCece wrote:I can't think of anything that can be done about that. I suppose get an interventional neuroradiologist involved to balloon the upper areas, but only if they thought it were safe and worth risking, which it doesn't seem to be.drsclafani wrote:They clot. In some, the hypoplasia extends higher than the balloon can go. So even when the vein is successfully dilated, the slow and meager flow from above is insufficient to maintain patency of the vein.If you're seeing clotting in the short-term, there really isn't any long-term for these veins....I dont think higher doses of anticoagulation will help. Perhaps long term anticoagulation would be more effective.That is awful.I think sometimes what happens is that we stretch beyond tolerance and the entire vein just "unzips". having no longer any wall strength, the thing just collapses and clots.
How would you determine what is within tolerance and what is beyond tolerance? These hypoplastic veins could still be stretched a little, for a mm gain or two?