This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge & Support Community

Complimenti Erika, e buona ripresa!
Kisses from Italy

I believe that for our health and life, even if CCSVI theory is not accepted as related to MS, why do a neuro should not TRY to reproduce (with MRV or Venous Doppler) the results by Zamboni? If I'd be a neuro interested in doing something radically new, thinking about PATIENTS, I'd try to do ANYTHIN...

http://www.msrc.co.uk/index.cfm?fuseact ... ageid=2877

From UK, but not about the first UK patients. Sorry if this link has been previously posted (please correct my english)

Ok, but we need to remember that the association is not MRV and MS but OBSTRUCTION + VENOUS FLOW and MS.

A good MRV may be a first step, but what matters is what happen about functioning of venous system, not only morphology.

Go on...

In all honesty, we do not have enough published research at this point in time for MS societies....after Jacobs first part of their study is released next month there will be more press- and as more research (such as Dr. Dake and Dr. Haacke) is published, there will be pressure placed on the MS soc...

Grazie per i baci!!!
And thanks to you and mrhodes40 for the welcoming

It's since about one months I'm reading you all every day in CCSVI forum...

Hi all, I agree with chris. The CCSVI hypothesis is made on FINDINGS OF VENOUS OBSTRUCTION in patients with MS and not in patients without. It's not a theory about autoimmunity. In every autoimmune disease the immune system is EVERY TIME described as the "actor" of the process, in medical ...