the bad news from stanford
the bad news from stanford
Dont know about you but it was pretty bad news to hear dake talk about his 24 patients
http://www.ccsvi.org/
all I'd heard was rumours from patients of a 20/20 score. The results he talks about were far more real world.
I liked the fantasy.
http://www.ccsvi.org/
all I'd heard was rumours from patients of a 20/20 score. The results he talks about were far more real world.
I liked the fantasy.
- ConstableComfortable
- Family Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: London, UK
I guess I missed something because I didn't find anything sad in this video. It was very educational and logical. I found that it makes the future look exciting. Unfortunately, the future won't arrive as fast as we would all like.
The only part that bothered me was when they talk about having patients pay their own way in blinded trials. It is sad that there is no government funding for these small trials and that people are being asked to pay thousands of dollars to be part of a trial.
Bruce.
The only part that bothered me was when they talk about having patients pay their own way in blinded trials. It is sad that there is no government funding for these small trials and that people are being asked to pay thousands of dollars to be part of a trial.
Bruce.
Re: the bad news from stanford
Bear in mind that Dake, although brilliant, was the first in this country and was learning along the way.Billmeik wrote:Dont know about you but it was pretty bad news to hear dake talk about his 24 patients
http://www.ccsvi.org/
all I'd heard was rumours from patients of a 20/20 score. The results he talks about were far more real world.
I liked the fantasy.
I personally know only one Dake patient, and her recovery was nothing short of spectacular.
My guess is that the difference between great and so-so results is that there is something else going on, eg other veins or whatever, with the latter group.
I can't wait to read Sinan's results from Kuwait.
- cheerleader
- Family Elder
- Posts: 5361
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:00 pm
- Location: southern California
Billmeik---
We had a great discussion going on this CCSVI Alliance exclusive video here:
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-14815.html
I hope you might read it and reconsider calling the news from Stanford "bad."
22 out of 24 patients have no new lesions at one year is pretty "good" in my book. It's actually been pretty freaking "great" in my family, where Jeff had over twenty brain lesions at diagnosis, and hasn't had any new ones since angioplasty. We need to let the doctors continue on and not characterize their work as good or bad. Right now, I'd just call it new and exciting---
cheer
We had a great discussion going on this CCSVI Alliance exclusive video here:
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-14815.html
I hope you might read it and reconsider calling the news from Stanford "bad."
22 out of 24 patients have no new lesions at one year is pretty "good" in my book. It's actually been pretty freaking "great" in my family, where Jeff had over twenty brain lesions at diagnosis, and hasn't had any new ones since angioplasty. We need to let the doctors continue on and not characterize their work as good or bad. Right now, I'd just call it new and exciting---
cheer
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com