^ spin ... and BS ...
you don't know me, nor if I'm likable. I'm quite sure, you're not likable. (in fact your interactions with past posters on this site who now only post about you on Facebook ... confirm that). EDIT - I'm pretty sure you're on Santa's naughty list.
I don't research every post, just try to reference people back to things. (EDIT - sometimes I refer to the wrong things, and that's OK because it's not my job to post on an MS forum like I suspect it is for some of the "skeptics" ... I have a real job). Reading cheer's studies is a lot more important than your petty arguments. I think everyone knows that.
The CCSVI tidal wave is building ... can't wait until it sweeps you away from this site!
Everyone else (according to Lyon) ... notice how they (the self described skeptics) never answer to the things actually asked, posted about, or in question. They always conveniently change the subject as to not be cornered and have to be held accountable for their statements? It's rather amusing. They know cheer's research is out there though ... oh and also notice how they don't challenge Dr. Sclafani with their BS statements they try to challenge everyone else with? because they know he'd burn their little playhouse down?