I don't really get how that is that offensive. You could assert that it was facetious, but I'm not sure that you could prove it.soapdiva884 wrote:This was his original post before editing it:
Laura, deep sympathy for your loss.
Thank you for come here and try to clear, from first hand, some misinformations that slip here and there over here.
One year past away but, unfortunatly, that was the first and not the last death after the Liberation procedure.
(last was canadian Mahir Mostic - http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-143686.html#143686)
Symphaty again, Malden
AGAIN ...? REALLY?
- soapdiva884
- Family Elder
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:00 pm
- Contact:
What is offensive is that he posted another persons death on that thread. Come on, have some tact for God's sake.
fa·ce·tious /fəˈsiʃəs/ Show Spelled
[fuh-see-shuhs] Show IPA
–adjective
1. not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark.
2. amusing; humorous.
3. lacking serious intent; concerned with something nonessential, amusing, or frivolous: a facetious person.
Facetious??? 1: He meant to post anothers death literally and seriously......2: ummmm not amusing or humorous........3: definately lacking something......like TACT!
fa·ce·tious /fəˈsiʃəs/ Show Spelled
[fuh-see-shuhs] Show IPA
–adjective
1. not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark.
2. amusing; humorous.
3. lacking serious intent; concerned with something nonessential, amusing, or frivolous: a facetious person.
Facetious??? 1: He meant to post anothers death literally and seriously......2: ummmm not amusing or humorous........3: definately lacking something......like TACT!
Boyfriend dx'd 6-6-06!!! RRMS............CCSVI procedure done on Nov. 13, 2010 and March 7, 2011 by Dr. Sclafani!
Can we focus on Malden and leave everyone else out of this, PLEASE? Thank you.
Malden needs to be banned, and have no fear, we will all be able to tell if he comes back under another name.
We need a count of how many PMs about Malden's atrocious behavior were sent in to jimmylegs because "more than five" PMs are needed to force jimmylegs to set up a public hearing where Malden tries to defend his behavior.
I sent in a PM. Is anyone else who sent in a PM today going to stand up for what's decent and right?
EJC?
Cece?
David1949?
Motiak?
Soapdiva?
CCSVIhusband?
concerned?
Scorpion?
Who else saw Malden's post and sent in a PM?
If Malden isn't banned and this embarrassment continues, Dr. Sclafani might not ever reach half a million views, and there will be no one to blame except the moderators who lost all respect from just about everyone here.
Malden needs to be banned, and have no fear, we will all be able to tell if he comes back under another name.
We need a count of how many PMs about Malden's atrocious behavior were sent in to jimmylegs because "more than five" PMs are needed to force jimmylegs to set up a public hearing where Malden tries to defend his behavior.
I sent in a PM. Is anyone else who sent in a PM today going to stand up for what's decent and right?
EJC?
Cece?
David1949?
Motiak?
Soapdiva?
CCSVIhusband?
concerned?
Scorpion?
Who else saw Malden's post and sent in a PM?
If Malden isn't banned and this embarrassment continues, Dr. Sclafani might not ever reach half a million views, and there will be no one to blame except the moderators who lost all respect from just about everyone here.
Puhleeze, that's overtly playing to the audience, even I can figure that one out.
Using concern as a springboard to even catch a glimpse of one's soapbox is disingenuous at best. Considering the source, the above is not much of a reach at all. With others, there would be some benefit of a doubt in order. It's like these rushes to primary post every negative jot and tittle about CCSVI that pops up in the media, know what I mean ;)
Using concern as a springboard to even catch a glimpse of one's soapbox is disingenuous at best. Considering the source, the above is not much of a reach at all. With others, there would be some benefit of a doubt in order. It's like these rushes to primary post every negative jot and tittle about CCSVI that pops up in the media, know what I mean ;)
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap
- soapdiva884
- Family Elder
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:00 pm
- Contact:
Done!! I have sent my complaints and the original posts to jimmyleggs in hopes someone does something.HappyPoet wrote:Can we focus on Malden and leave everyone else out of this, PLEASE? Thank you.
Malden needs to be banned, and have no fear, we will all be able to tell if he comes back under another name.
We need a count of how many PMs about Malden's atrocious behavior were sent in to jimmylegs because "more than five" PMs are needed to force jimmylegs to set up a public hearing where Malden tries to defend his behavior.
I sent in a PM. Is anyone else who sent in a PM today going to stand up for what's decent and right?
EJC?
Cece?
David1949?
Motiak?
Soapdiva?
CCSVIhusband?
concerned?
Scorpion?
Who else saw Malden's post and sent in a PM?
If Malden isn't banned and this embarrassment continues, Dr. Sclafani might not ever reach half a million views, and there will be no one to blame except the moderators who lost all respect from just about everyone here.
Boyfriend dx'd 6-6-06!!! RRMS............CCSVI procedure done on Nov. 13, 2010 and March 7, 2011 by Dr. Sclafani!
Yes, that's my post that was deleted. I did not edit it, I wrote a new one, but still can't figure how can Holy sister, to whom I am writing to, be hurt by that words I wrote.soapdiva884 wrote:This was his original post before editing it:
Laura, deep sympathy for your loss.
Thank you for come here and try to clear, from first hand, some misinformations that slip here and there over here.
One year past away but, unfortunatly, that was the first and not the last death after the Liberation procedure.
(last was canadian Mahir Mostic - http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-143686.html#143686)
Symphaty again, M
One day I observed a post of his with perfect English that was then edited within a minute of posting to have spelling and punctuation errors!soapdiva884 wrote:How does your English become perfect and yet there are so many posts by you that the English is clearly not perfect? Not understanding that one!
Here's a link to the post. I wish I'd caught his original.
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-141576.html#141576
Yes, I also sent a pm to jimmylegs.
Great job!!soapdiva884 wrote:Done!! I have sent my complaints and the original posts to jimmyleggs in hopes someone does something.HappyPoet wrote:Can we focus on Malden and leave everyone else out of this, PLEASE? Thank you.
Malden needs to be banned, and have no fear, we will all be able to tell if he comes back under another name.
We need a count of how many PMs about Malden's atrocious behavior were sent in to jimmylegs because "more than five" PMs are needed to force jimmylegs to set up a public hearing where Malden tries to defend his behavior.
I sent in a PM. Is anyone else who sent in a PM today going to stand up for what's decent and right?
EJC?
Cece?
David1949?
Motiak?
Soapdiva?
CCSVIhusband?
concerned?
Scorpion?
Who else saw Malden's post and sent in a PM?
If Malden isn't banned and this embarrassment continues, Dr. Sclafani might not ever reach half a million views, and there will be no one to blame except the moderators who lost all respect from just about everyone here.
Keep 'em coming, folks, and let's clean up this board by sending a message to everyone that we can force change by staying within the rules.
I think you were looking for this one:soapdiva884 wrote:What is offensive is that he posted another persons death on that thread. Come on, have some tact for God's sake.
fa·ce·tious /fəˈsiʃəs/ Show Spelled
[fuh-see-shuhs] Show IPA
–adjective
1. not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark.
2. amusing; humorous.
3. lacking serious intent; concerned with something nonessential, amusing, or frivolous: a facetious person.
Facetious??? 1: He meant to post anothers death literally and seriously......2: ummmm not amusing or humorous........3: definately lacking something......like TACT!
And also I said you could maybe argue that he was being facetious, I don't know Malden or what his intentions are, but at face value the comment consisted of condolences, and the stating of a sad fact.[/quote]fa·ce·tious/fəˈsēSHəs/
Adjective: Treating serious issues with deliberately inappropriate humor; flippant.
- CCSVIhusband
- Family Elder
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Contact:
I sent one as well ... also saw the post Cece was referring to ... it was "odd" changing spelling to wrong things, especially, if - as it's been claimed - he has to use a translator into English. (he's doing that awful quick tonight ... but maybe I'm just "skeptical")Cece wrote:One day I observed a post of his with perfect English that was then edited within a minute of posting to have spelling and punctuation errors!soapdiva884 wrote:How does your English become perfect and yet there are so many posts by you that the English is clearly not perfect? Not understanding that one!
Here's a link to the post. I wish I'd caught his original.
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-141576.html#141576
Yes, I also sent a pm to jimmylegs.
I still haven't seen an answer to the questions soapdiva asked as well ... but replies to a lot of other things (ignoring those questions - almost deliberately it would seem).
me
"==========" <--- the fray.
Last edited by CCSVIhusband on Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Malden, it doesn't matter anymore if you don't understand why Holly's family and others might be hurt. It's too late. You were told by many people it was hurtful *and* the moderators deleted your post, both of which clearly told you that your post was not proper, YET you dare come back and have the nerve, the audacity, to post the same hurtful post again.
You'll have your chance to defend yourself, but not here in this thread. This thread is to collect the required number of PMs to force a public hearing at which time you can try to defend yourself.
EDIT: I recently read on a thread that Cece said you could get a second chance after the hearing, so I assume she found that info in the official rules. Yes, Cece?
You'll have your chance to defend yourself, but not here in this thread. This thread is to collect the required number of PMs to force a public hearing at which time you can try to defend yourself.
EDIT: I recently read on a thread that Cece said you could get a second chance after the hearing, so I assume she found that info in the official rules. Yes, Cece?
Yes, this is serious. You could be the cause of that happening.Malden wrote:Is this serious?!HappyPoet wrote:Can we focus on Malden and leave everyone else out of this, PLEASE? Thank you.
Malden needs to be banned, and have no fear, we will all be able to tell if he comes back under another name.
We need a count of how many PMs about Malden's atrocious behavior were sent in to jimmylegs because "more than five" PMs are needed to force jimmylegs to set up a public hearing where Malden tries to defend his behavior.
I sent in a PM. Is anyone else who sent in a PM today going to stand up for what's decent and right?
EJC?
Cece?
David1949?
Motiak?
Soapdiva?
CCSVIhusband?
concerned?
Scorpion?
Who else saw Malden's post and sent in a PM?
If Malden isn't banned and this embarrassment continues, Dr. Sclafani might not ever reach half a million views, and there will be no one to blame except the moderators who lost all respect from just about everyone here.