DrSclafani answers some questions

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
User avatar
drsclafani
Family Elder
Posts: 3182
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

Re: follow-up ultrasound in Canada...

Post by drsclafani »

kkala wrote:My mother had the liberation treatment done by Dr. Simka last June (2010).

She has had follow-up ultrasounds here in Ontario, but of course there is nobody who will deal with anything around CCSVI here.

The first follow-up at six months was fine, another done two weeks ago looks not so great (restenosis?)

"The internal jugular stent appears patent with internal hyperechoic echos. Venous insufficiency was evident with reflux in the internal jugular vein at 0 and 90 degrees. Conclusion: Patent left IJV stent, with partial thrombus/or fibrointoimal hyperplasisl and venous reflux."

Any advice? Is this basically saying "need CCSVI round 2" ?

Many thanks,

Kariné
i would think that perhaps anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy might be helpful. You need to find out how much of the stent is filled with thrombus or hyperplasia. Hopefully intimal hyperplasia may resolve with more time.

i hope you have a doctor to advise you, send the images to dr simka/ludgya
User avatar
griff
Family Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:00 pm

Post by griff »

drsclafani wrote: Since i think that most of the stenoses are valvular problems, i would suspect that the history of current treatment of stenosis is representative. However if valve stenosis is treated, then there is hope that we can improve restenosis rates in the long run because we may not need to stretch the normal vein resulting in injury that goes on to stenosis.
Dr Sclafani, does this mean that so far most of us veins have been dilated (maybe unnecessarily) causing potential trauma (and hence potential scarring) to the vein walls?
User avatar
Algis
Family Elder
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: XinYi District, Taipei City, , Taiwan

Post by Algis »

potential trauma (and hence potential scarring) to the vein walls
Actually I am pretty worried of that; but on an other hand: many peeps get stabbed; shoot at; slip throat'ed ( :P ) and some recover; their veins never seem to be an issue...

People have organs cut, replaced, radio'ded, pierced and some I can't even translate... But the veins just seems like a ditch where everything goes and get drained; nothing more, nothing less...

Why is that?
User avatar
drsclafani
Family Elder
Posts: 3182
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

Post by drsclafani »

griff wrote:
drsclafani wrote: Since i think that most of the stenoses are valvular problems, i would suspect that the history of current treatment of stenosis is representative. However if valve stenosis is treated, then there is hope that we can improve restenosis rates in the long run because we may not need to stretch the normal vein resulting in injury that goes on to stenosis.
Dr Sclafani, does this mean that so far most of us veins have been dilated (maybe unnecessarily) causing potential trauma (and hence potential scarring) to the vein walls?
no...the dilatation may have been of the appropriate diameter and at the correct location. Injury depends upon how much bigger than the normal vein the balloon is dilated. The stenosis that everyone is treating is generally at the same level. it is the understanding of the nature of the stenosis that is changing. That understanding can drive treatment logic
User avatar
griff
Family Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:00 pm

Post by griff »

drsclafani wrote:
griff wrote:
drsclafani wrote: Since i think that most of the stenoses are valvular problems, i would suspect that the history of current treatment of stenosis is representative. However if valve stenosis is treated, then there is hope that we can improve restenosis rates in the long run because we may not need to stretch the normal vein resulting in injury that goes on to stenosis.
Dr Sclafani, does this mean that so far most of us veins have been dilated (maybe unnecessarily) causing potential trauma (and hence potential scarring) to the vein walls?
no...the dilatation may have been of the appropriate diameter and at the correct location. Injury depends upon how much bigger than the normal vein the balloon is dilated. The stenosis that everyone is treating is generally at the same level. it is the understanding of the nature of the stenosis that is changing. That understanding can drive treatment logic
Thank you, dr Sclafani. I must admit that I am afraid of getting scarring, so your words sound good. I was just reading 20% scarring ratios with repeated angioplasties of coronary arteries, etc.
User avatar
1eye
Family Elder
Posts: 3780
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by 1eye »

Dr. Sclafani:

I am gaining incredible respect for you by watching this present discussion. What seems to be happening I cannot even fathom.

I am eager to hear more. God speed.
This unit of entertainment not brought to you by FREMULON.
Not a doctor.
"I'm still here, how 'bout that? I may have lost my lunchbox, but I'm still here." John Cowan Hartford (December 30, 1937 – June 4, 2001)
User avatar
vivavie
Family Elder
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: QC, Canada
Contact:

Re: follow-up ultrasound in Canada...

Post by vivavie »

drsclafani wrote: Hopefully intimal hyperplasia may resolve with more time.
Hum, I thought hyperplasia gets permanent with time!?

I was devastated when I learned that my stents were getting occluded again! I tried to ignore it for a while... but I know it is getting worse. I feel the same way as when my jug collapsed: same kind of numbness in legs (as if opening of bottle of champagne), pain is increasing and getting weaker by the day. From going up and down the stairs loaded with boxes after the Feb procedure to a wheelchair by the end of the month!

I am going for another US mid May.

Options:
1- Forget about the LIJ: not anymore, it makes too much a difference!

2- Angioplasty to reopened the stents before it is permanent. Will it stabilized with time or keep coming back?

3- Adding a covered stent; 1st time I had candywrap stenosis. Being covered won't prevent that??

4- Radio Frequency ablation as read on Facebook by Dr McGuckin, Do you do that?

What do you think? Are there any other options?

This past year has been very difficult emotionnally and financialy, I have to make the best decision... soon :cry:
User avatar
WeWillBeatMS
Family Elder
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Two weeks before Liberation Procedure with you

Post by WeWillBeatMS »

drsclafani wrote:
WeWillBeatMS wrote:Dr Sclafani,

I'm two weeks out from flying up to Brooklyn for the testing and procedure with you and I'm getting a little concerned (to say the least) about restenosis. What are the restenosis rates that you are seeing for people now? Also, daily I take 2,000 IU D3 daily, 500 MG of DHA (fish oil) Nordic Natural pills, 81 mg aspirin twice a day, and I do pretty good eating healthy. Are there any things you would recommend I do in these last few weeks to help my chances of not restenosing?

thank you,

WeWillBeatMS
Let me explain why i cannot give a good answer for this question. It is based upon the misfortune I had when the hospital stopped my program.

The vast majority of my patients have been done after a six month hiatus brought about when the hospital forbade me to perform the procedure. I resumed on weekends in November, so the vast majority of my patients have been treated in the past six months with most of those in the past four months. According to Zamboni, most restenosis occurs after the seventh month after treatment. Therefore my data is not old enough to give a good reflection of restenosis.

Let's review the cumulative restenosis rate described by Zamboni

Image

In this chart, he evaluates the percentage of patients who are patent over time. You can see that there is an overall progressive increase in the number of patients who restenosed


If we look at the chart we seen that most of the restenosis occurs between 8 and 16 months.

Image
You can see with time the percentage of patients who did not restenose went from 100% to 47% at 18 months.
At 90 days about 90% had not restenosed. (orange)
at 180 days about 85% had not restenosed (yellow)
At 210 days about 65% are stenosis free (green)
At one year about 55% have no stenosis (purple
at 18 months only 47% of patients have not restenosed.(red)

So we can expect that at least half of patients will restenose. Reducing intimal damage by procedural and medical manuevers, by healthy living practices such as cessation of smoking, better nutrition, etc MAY prolong the interval to restenosis. Surveillance by ultrasound mayhave value.

This restenosis seems to be an inevitable occurence in the majority of patients. We have to live with it until new devices, new medical therapies and new techniques reduce this problem.

This is very common in medical practice. People get infections. they get treated. they get another infection. Diabetics blood sugar goes up, is treated, come down, goes up again.

Face it, we are partners for a long time

S
I definitely appreciate the well thought out response even if it is not exactly what I was hoping for.


WeWillBeatMS
User avatar
WeWillBeatMS
Family Elder
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by WeWillBeatMS »

Dr. Sclafani,

Are the external jugular veins also tested for CCSVI? I know that they have not proven to be a regular problem but what about for the people like myself who have lost hearing in one ear? And at times even my good ear rings and pops and feels plugged like my bad one does all of the time.

WeWillBeatMS
User avatar
THEGREEKFROMTHED
Family Elder
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:00 pm

Post by THEGREEKFROMTHED »

Sal, two questions.

First--any reason why entering "veins" from a different location would be in any way beneficisl in your estimation??? as in this new "artery" findings...

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110 ... 0/SPORTS02


Second--Is it true Osama Bin Laden had donated his jugular veins to Suny Downstate for scientific purposes prior to perishing?

www.thegreekfromdetroit.com
[/u] :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Donnchadh
Family Elder
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:00 pm

Post by Donnchadh »

WeWillBeatMS wrote:Dr. Sclafani,

Are the external jugular veins also tested for CCSVI? I know that they have not proven to be a regular problem but what about for the people like myself who have lost hearing in one ear? And at times even my good ear rings and pops and feels plugged like my bad one does all of the time.

WeWillBeatMS
Dr. Makris routed though my external Jugular vein to bypass the collateral veins, and it was fine. So it is entirely possible to check it out.

Donnchadh
Kitty says, "Take that, you stenosis!"

Got MS?.....Get Liberated!
User avatar
drsclafani
Family Elder
Posts: 3182
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

Post by drsclafani »

THEGREEKFROMTHED wrote:Sal, two questions.

First--any reason why entering "veins" from a different location would be in any way beneficisl in your estimation??? as in this new "artery" findings...

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110 ... 0/SPORTS02
we have discussed entering the vein from the neck. This has value when we cannot get the catheter to get beyond the obstruction
Another possiblel optionis to enter the right and the left jugular veins from the arm. but i am not overwhelmed by this option. At best it is a niche accesss for the vein.l
User avatar
drsclafani
Family Elder
Posts: 3182
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

Post by drsclafani »

WeWillBeatMS wrote:Dr. Sclafani,

Are the external jugular veins also tested for CCSVI? I know that they have not proven to be a regular problem but what about for the people like myself who have lost hearing in one ear? And at times even my good ear rings and pops and feels plugged like my bad one does all of the time.

WeWillBeatMS
The external jugular drains the face and scalp. I do not study these veins and i do not think these veins are the first line of action, perhaps they take on a greater potential when the internal jugular cannot be opened or has clotted off.
User avatar
Mathd
Family Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Gatineau, QC, CA

Post by Mathd »

Hi DrS

from what you seen, what's the frequency of obstruction in the Illiac veins?
You realy surprised me when you balooned my illiac because I was thinking that will be higher! and is a valve was the problem with this vein too??

and what can cause valve problem? it is genetic?
User avatar
WeWillBeatMS
Family Elder
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by WeWillBeatMS »

drsclafani wrote:
WeWillBeatMS wrote:Dr. Sclafani,

Are the external jugular veins also tested for CCSVI? I know that they have not proven to be a regular problem but what about for the people like myself who have lost hearing in one ear? And at times even my good ear rings and pops and feels plugged like my bad one does all of the time.

WeWillBeatMS
The external jugular drains the face and scalp. I do not study these veins and i do not think these veins are the first line of action, perhaps they take on a greater potential when the internal jugular cannot be opened or has clotted off.
OK. So which veins are responsible for draining the ears?

WeWillBeatMS
Post Reply

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”