Bidding and cost of CCSVI treatment

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
Post Reply
User avatar
1eye
Family Elder
Posts: 3780
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Bidding and cost of CCSVI treatment

Post by 1eye »

I would not like to see a lot of competition develop in this area of medicine.

While I think it is important to keep gouging and greed-heads under control we still don't know enough, and doctors should be at least collecting data, at best running field trials, which will cost money. There is no guarantee except their professional consciences, that they will spend the time and money it takes to do this.

If bidding erupts there will be a temptation to cut the data collection and science out of the business. That would be the wrong direction at this early stage of things. I don't agree that everyone must be in a clinical trial or not treated at all, but I think it may be up to the IRs and vascular surgeons to impose some kind of self-discipline on the bean-counting end of things, and there needs to be some kind of rational economic model around fund-raising and science associated with this research or it risks stagnation.

Does anyone agree or am I just being paranoid again?
This unit of entertainment not brought to you by FREMULON.
Not a doctor.
"I'm still here, how 'bout that? I may have lost my lunchbox, but I'm still here." John Cowan Hartford (December 30, 1937 – June 4, 2001)
User avatar
Trish317
Family Elder
Posts: 357
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Rhode Island

Re: Bidding

Post by Trish317 »

1eye wrote:I would not like to see a lot of competition develop in this area of medicine.

While I think it is important to keep gouging and greed-heads under control we still don't know enough, and doctors should be at least collecting data, at best running field trials, which will cost money. There is no guarantee except their professional consciences, that they will spend the time and money it takes to do this.

If bidding erupts there will be a temptation to cut the data collection and science out of the business. That would be the wrong direction at this early stage of things. I don't agree that everyone must be in a clinical trial or not treated at all, but I think it may be up to the IRs and vascular surgeons to impose some kind of self-discipline on the bean-counting end of things, and there needs to be some kind of rational economic model around fund-raising and science associated with this research or it risks stagnation.

Does anyone agree or am I just being paranoid again?
I agree and I don't think you're being paranoid. As someone else said, cost should not be the first consideration when choosing a doctor to perform the CCSVI procedure.
Post Reply

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”