This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge & Support Community
Welcome to This is MS, the leading forum for Multiple Sclerosis research and support. Join our friendly community of patients, caregivers, and researchers celebrating over 20 years of delivering hope through knowledge.
I just voted and it's at 55% "all of the above" (Determining safety of venoplasty, Identifying patient-reported outcomes of venoplasty, Validation of CCSVI criteria and identification of patients meeting those criteria, Determing if venoplasty results are beneficial and sustained) and only 24% "none of the above - I don't agree with the CIHR decision."
The opposite of what it was before. Now it is more than 2 to 1 in favor of the study.
Great find Dr SqueakyCat. Just voted 'all of above' its now 58.62%.
Canadians please vote and others have fun.
MarkW
Last edited by MarkW on Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mark Walker - Oxfordshire, England. Retired Industrial Pharmacist. 24 years of study about MS.
CCSVI Comments:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/8359854/MS-experts-in-Britain-have-to-open-their-minds.html
Aug. 7, 09 Doppler Ultras. in Poland, left Jugul. valve problem, RRMS since 1996, now SPMS,
- Nov.3,09: one stent in the left jug. vein in Katowice, Poland, LDN, never on DMDs
- Jan. 19, 11: control venography in Katowice - negative but I feel worse
The poll has been removed from the home page and doesn't come up in the search function. I wonder if they found out about us and if the results will ever be published. ;)