Review: MS Wars — Hope, Science and the Internet

[dania]

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/3 ... z1mFyQBrRD

[jackiejay]

I guess we know this guy''s opinion..."we already know part of the harm; the hopefully temporary derailment of genuine research and the search for therapies that work".....and the icing on the cake,this condescending statement...." tragic situations that bring people to irrationality"......

[Billmeik]

I would say the jury is still out as to whether this diversion in thought about MS has been justified.

I do think it should be illegal to mention Doepp's 0% paper from 2 or 3 years ago without mentioning his total turnaround(if I remember rich) this year.

Also mentioning zivadinof's 56% paper without mentioning his 2011(12?) paper where he found 80% is wrong.



0



5

[1eye]

I encourage you to look at the insiders comments, which might require you to "register". There I meet the review's author in a drawn out discussion which I finally had to leave, because he got too long-winded. It follows the party line, as written by you-know-who: placebo, remissions, waste of research dollars, no evidence, etc..