Loriyas wrote:Geeze Gogo, what do you want? This continuous bashing of the antibiotic therapy (and of Sarah) is growing tiresome. Not every therapy works for every patient. But a patient should have the opportunity to try whatever therapy they deem appropriate. There is a ton of research available for someone to make an intelligent decision on whether this therapy is the right one for them or not. You obviously have chosen not to give it a try for yourself. Good for you! But others may decide it is right for them. Good for them! But stop with the scare tactics.
No one is bashing anyone. In most of the forums here people share infos, research papers, etc on therapies. Here, I hear only personal experiences. That is very subjective and someone can not conclude anything from individual experiences.
Aren't these forums are for asking and sharing info?
I think the theory is interesting and there are papers about it. However, I read nothing on how Cpn is related to all those things that we already know about the different types of MS. Cpn can not be detected in MS patients, so I assume the only thing that might help determine who benefits from the therapy is the well documented experience of the doctors. Don't you think that someone should be interested in whether he might benefit from a treatment or not before starting it?
If anyone has info from doctors or recent research papers, why does not she/he share it here? You can not try all the different therapies, angioplasty, abx for Cpn, abx for lyme, stem cells, etc. based on very different theories.
I remember the time when angioplasty was the cure for MS.
You are all just arguing instead giving any info. Don't you think you would help much more people with that? You can post a short paper on the protocol and what and how to take and that it is. As far as I read the posts here
