CCSVI in healthy trial subjects

If it's on your mind and it has to do with multiple sclerosis in any way, post it here.
Post Reply
SLOV8213
Family Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:01 pm

CCSVI in healthy trial subjects

Post by SLOV8213 »

There as been a few trials now conducted where researchers have compared the narrowing of veins in patients diagnosed with MS and what they deem to be healthy individuals. These health individuals have been related and unrelated to patients. The testing criteria of either ultra sound/venoplasty or a combination of both was used to define their vein narrowing.

What I'm curious about is. Does anyone know or is aware of one of these so called healthy individuals who after receiving this vein narrowing diagnosis, went on to seek vein widening treatment. And if so did they receive any benefits or feel any different after treatment?
centenarian100
Family Elder
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:51 am

Re: CCSVI in healthy trial subjects

Post by centenarian100 »

SLOV8213 wrote:There as been a few trials now conducted where researchers have compared the narrowing of veins in patients diagnosed with MS and what they deem to be healthy individuals. These health individuals have been related and unrelated to patients. The testing criteria of either ultra sound/venoplasty or a combination of both was used to define their vein narrowing.

What I'm curious about is. Does anyone know or is aware of one of these so called healthy individuals who after receiving this vein narrowing diagnosis, went on to seek vein widening treatment. And if so did they receive any benefits or feel any different after treatment?
I don't think it would be ethical to perform a procedure on a perfectly healthy person.

Dr. Dake said that he was approached by a patient with lyme disease to perform liberation, and he refused as there are no reports on an association between lyme and CCSVI.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”