Sarah

Are you doing the script D2, one a week? Or your own D3? We found out that the script we got last time was D2 and we followed up on CPn Help about the difference between D2 and D3. You might find those threads of interest. Red seems to be snap-on the D3 topic. Blood for pancakes, seems like a fair trade?Loriyas wrote:On Monday I had my one year follow-up appointment at Vanderbilt. Once again the appointment lasted approximately 1 1/2 hours so it was very thorough. Bottom line, treatment wise, we are going to continue with the protocol as is for right now. I felt like I gave half my blood as the doctor wanted to check 1) vitamin Di level now that I have been on 50,000 IU per week for 6 months 2) cpni titers at this point 3) and blood for a genetics study Vanderbilt is currently doing.
Yup, you're not alone. Kim felt that way too. Heck, I felt that way too. When all is said and done, it's clear to me that these doctors know what they are doing and some of the details I think about are likely completely irrelevant, OMG! Did I say that? Seriously, isn't it great to feel the relief of knowing you get to experience die-off for 3 more years? Actually, it's very comforting to know that 1) you're wiping out pathogens and 2) you get to continue wiping out pathogens.Loriyas wrote:The doctor mentioned that I would be doing this for another 2 -3 years which I was glad to hear as I have worried that he may decide I am better so should be done with this. I worried about this unnecessarily! He made it clear that you are not done with this in just a year.
I'm not sure which doctor you mean, but there are two that see Kim and the one that is not Sriram was about the same for us. I'm hesitant to think that it's a good or bad thing for doctor's at Vanderbilt to be swayed before something like a new paper has been released - I believe it was you who told me that a very solid approach is to go about trying to prove that your hypothosis is false. I'm so very happy for you that you started when you did. BTW, Kim's next appt is July 1.Loriyas wrote: IWhen I first went to Vanderbilt last year this doctor mentioned that since I was considered a "mild" case I may not want to start abxi therapy until or unless I worsened. At this appointment he told me that in the study he is conducting (which I am not a part of) the results are not "spectacular" but that he is thinking it is because most of those patients have come to him after they have failed all other therapies, so their cases are much more difficult. So Vanderbilt's current thinking is that it is better to start abxi therapy earlier rather than later (thank you to all of you who encouraged me to get started right away last year).
One speculation I have is this concept I have read about whereby an antibiotic is rated for a MIC and MBC and that these help you know how much you need to take to get either effect. A little slide show about MIC and MBC I continue to ponder after watching this about 4 times - does the amount of ABX each patient needs vary depending on the amount of bacterial load they carry? Thank you for your post and I'm really happy you had a good appointment. What did they say about your MRI's? KenLoriyas wrote:I noticed that the doctor's demeanor was different from even the last appointment 6 months ago. He is not skeptical about this treatment any longer but rather trying very hard to learn and understand why it works for some and not for others. I took this as a very positive change. He told me to stay with all the same supplementsi that I have been taking, including NAC and vitamin D.