

Thanks for sharing this, sou. From all appearances, Dr. Zamboni is a good man, and a caring doctor. I'm glad he returned your inquiry so quickly.sou wrote:Hi.
The city where I live is very close to Ferrara. It is 30 hours to Venice by ship and less than 1 hour Venice-Padova-Ferrara by car. The 30 hours in ship are not that many, since travelling with ship is not tiring at all.
I contacted Dr Zamboni and asked if I could undergo the Liberation procedure. I was amazed by his quick reply, yesterday afternoon, if you think that it was Good Friday in Italy.
He is not allowed to treat anybody by the ethics committee. However, he said that the procedure will be open to the public immediately after the end of the trial. So, a few more months...
sou
The moderator closed the thread down relating to Professor Zamboni. Could he be working for the pharma that runs the forum?
Can't wait....He is not allowed to treat anybody by the ethics committee. However, he said that the procedure will be open to the public immediately after the end of the trial. So, a few more months...
sou
Wow! Sou did you get the idea they were anticipating success already? the way you wrote it it seems like there was no "If" or "possibly" in that answer.open to the public immediately after the end of the trial. So, a few more months
Maybe they (md's drs) can say it is for cardio purposes...circulation for those of us that sit all day...give a different dx? to get the treatment...If you have a venogram and it shows a stenosis, could an insurance company deny treatment? How could they say "yes we see the stenosis and we see the trial but we won't treat the stenosis because itis too new? Does anyon think it will go that way?
Hi Wobbly, I believe that is a distinct possibility too. It is possible this triggers an autoiommune process secondarily and also it is possible the lesion will need significant support even after the venous issue is relieved.The area is after all full of immune cells that do not belong therehow abt both/ this treatment very well may needed 2 be backed up by drugs
The doc at Stanford explained that reflux and stenoses in the jugular and azygos veins as found by Zamboni will covered by insurance. Correcting venous insufficiency which involves internal organs is not a "cosmetic" surgery (like varicose veins which might not be covered by some insurance.) Venous return from the brain and spine to the heart is essential for the body's health. Before doppler ultrasound, these blockages were not noticed until autopsy, if at all. In order for insurance to cover the tests, we are using headache and edema as the reason for examination. This is true...and may prove to have a venous cause.peekaboo wrote:mrhodes wrote:Maybe they (md's drs) can say it is for cardio purposes...circulation for those of us that sit all day...give a different dx? to get the treatment...If you have a venogram and it shows a stenosis, could an insurance company deny treatment? How could they say "yes we see the stenosis and we see the trial but we won't treat the stenosis because itis too new? Does anyon think it will go that way?