First, a shout out to all of you guys who are forging ahead........Thanks to all you brave ones!
One of the more accepted aspects of MS is its geographic distribution. How does one marry the CCSVI theory with this?
Here is my quandry--- if we were only talking genetics, inheritance could be used to explain incidence geographically because of ethnic makeup in regions, for example, higher rates of MS in people of northern European ancestry living in indigenous areas. We could then look at CCVSI from a genetics point of view.
But what really stumps me is that ancestry/genetics alone doesn't explain MS distribution rates, geography is the key here- as in the example of one's risk rate going up when one moves from a low incidence rate to a high incidence rate before adolescence, independent of ancestry.
OK---I know there is a lot of brainy horsepower on here--so let it rip!
